Rorix
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2003
- Messages
- 1,818
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2005
So dude, why are you disputing the point? I was dissing the my_sharona dude or whatever his/her name is for identifying him/herself by the newspaper it reads, and you came in suggesting that the Telegraph is a shitty newspaper, which isn't even a relevant point, and now you're saying ALL NEWSPAPERS are crap. Well, if there is NO NEWSPAPER that is not "craptastic", then how is your post even a) making a point or b) anything worth mentioning??erawamai said:I don't think anyone was disputing that. But in the continuum between craptastic to better than craptastic I'd rate the SMH as less craptastic than the Daily Tele.
Don't misquote me. I said I could best YOU on any issue. I've read your posts man. It's not something I'd mention given how many poor posters there are on the forum now, but you were trying to demonstrate your "higher" value to the posters on the board because I allegedly watched sensationalist current affair programs and you didn't.You seem to be assuming a fair bit there. I have no idea where you pull the idea that you can best everyone on any issue.
You're just a member of the large part of the forum which derides, in no particular order, the Telegraph, Fox News, Miranda Devine and George Bush ignoring the fact that THEY THEMSELVES rarely if ever post anything worth, in my opinion, reading and think that people actually care about them making fun of <random object>.
In short, NOBODY CARES IF YOU THINK THE TELEGRAPH, A CURRENT AFFAIR OR TODAY TONIGHT ARE NEWSWORTHY PROGRAMS. IT IS NOT WORTH POSTING. GO OUT AND ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING.
</anti board rant>
Edit: Yes Slide Rule, that's what I'm saying. There's sometimes an exception with opinion pieces and it's not a deriding of the newspaper itself, since its purpose is not to give you an in-depth view of world events or even domestic events. Not many consumers really want to read the philosophical divide between two different taxation proposals.
Last edited: