Alright, so the course I am aiming for is Comm/Law, however I did not make the atar-cutoff (achieved low 99s).
My current preferences are:
1) Comm/Law @ UNSW
2) Comm/Law @ USYD
3) Comm @ UNSW
Would this be the smartest way to approach the course preferences, although the most likely outcome is doing Commerce the first year, then transferring internally.
That's why I was also considering this alternative:
1) Comm @ UNSW
2) Comm/Law @ UNSW
3) Comm/Law @ USYD
This essentially provides security for my placement into Commerce, however am I disadvantaged by choosing Option 1 as opposed to Option 2?
Is it a risk having Comm/Law as a higher preference? Would this cause other people (with lower ATARs) with Commerce as their first preference to fill up the spots and thereby leave me without an offer since my Commerce is my 3rd preference? Or would I have an equal chance getting into Commerce (Preference 3) compared to a person with a lower ATAR with Commerce as Preference 1?
My current preferences are:
1) Comm/Law @ UNSW
2) Comm/Law @ USYD
3) Comm @ UNSW
Would this be the smartest way to approach the course preferences, although the most likely outcome is doing Commerce the first year, then transferring internally.
That's why I was also considering this alternative:
1) Comm @ UNSW
2) Comm/Law @ UNSW
3) Comm/Law @ USYD
This essentially provides security for my placement into Commerce, however am I disadvantaged by choosing Option 1 as opposed to Option 2?
Is it a risk having Comm/Law as a higher preference? Would this cause other people (with lower ATARs) with Commerce as their first preference to fill up the spots and thereby leave me without an offer since my Commerce is my 3rd preference? Or would I have an equal chance getting into Commerce (Preference 3) compared to a person with a lower ATAR with Commerce as Preference 1?
