CSSA MX2 Trial (1 Viewer)

[abcdefghij123]

The final question would be walking you through proof #3 in http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/rjchapma/etc/zeta2.pdf I presume.

sort of similar.

The 'basel' element was only in the final 2 marks. in fact, parts i - v all culminated in the result in part v. You could do part vi independently (using only the result from (v))

 

[Carrotsticks]

Why is Basel Problem so common in MX2 exams?

They've used the living shit out of it.

Because it's the first p-series to converge.

And just to clarify, people usually associate p-series to integer exponents, but they converge for any p > 1.

 

[abcdefghij123]

Overall the paper was straighforward up until the last question. Q1-15 were generic textbook stuff (bar 1 question which required a bit of thinking but was only worth 2 marks and wasn't hard when you worked out what you were doing - i.e. finding coordinates of C ). Last question was mostly tedious more than anything else.

 

[maths lover]

The final question would be walking you through proof #3 in http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/rjchapma/etc/zeta2.pdf I presume.

the sigma notation thing seemed to be much messier than the expression in this document but. also the reduction formula was one of the harder ones i have seen.

 

[maths lover]

this was the multiple choice question people are talking about. it said in how many ways can 5 letters be chosen from the word ARRANGE. what is the answer?.

 

[Sanjeet]

I KNEW IT.

I really hope someone from the BOS Meat (Winter one) had the CSSA as their paper for MX2. I bashed those questions into them pretty hard.

 

[Alkanes]

Yea MC was bullshit as. Had to do a lot of work for 1 lousy mark. Yea for the ARRANGE question one, I got 21 but I thought it was just too easy so I tossed up between 9 or 12.

 

[Johnstan]

Yea MC was bullshit as. Had to do a lot of work for 1 lousy mark. Yea for the ARRANGE question one, I got 21 but I thought it was just too easy so I tossed up between 9 or 12.

as if brah?
tell me a few questions that u found required work

 

[Sindivyn]

Yea MC was bullshit as. Had to do a lot of work for 1 lousy mark. Yea for the ARRANGE question one, I got 21 but I thought it was just too easy so I tossed up between 9 or 12.

Yeah, I think the 21 one was wrong because it didn't factor in the factor there were two R's, therefore the would be less combinations (I think).

 

[Alkanes]

as if brah?
tell me a few questions that u found required work

Look, I'm not the biggest fan of multiple choice. And you might be. But that's what I felt.

 

[Johnstan]

Look, I'm not the biggest fan of multiple choice. And you might be. But that's what I felt.

nah i aint either- just curious as to which questions u reckon were tricky

 

[maths lover]

can someone answer that probability question i posted earlier. in how many ways can you arrange 5 letters chosen from the word ARRANGE.

 

[zeebobDD]

can someone answer that probability question i posted earlier. in how many ways can you arrange 5 letters chosen from the word ARRANGE.

7! / 2!^2

 

[RealiseNothing]

7! / 2!^2

No, you want to choose only 5 letters, not all 7.

 

[Johnstan]

i got 30 for my answer... any1 confirm?

 

[iampeterr]

this was the multiple choice question people are talking about. it said in how many ways can 5 letters be chosen from the word ARRANGE. what is the answer?.

i put 21 .. but im sure it was wrong, people said they put 12 cause 21 was too simple. idk

 

[RealiseNothing]

It's 12.

 

[maths lover]

It's 12.

idk but 10 wasn't an answer. i think there was 9,12,21 and 30.

 

[RealiseNothing]

idk but 10 wasn't an answer. i think there was 9,12,21 and 30.

It's definately 12.

 

[maths lover]

did you just count it or can you show working?.