It is not very common to find EE2 students using the traditional OCER structure of narrative in their Major Works. Part of this can be attributed to the Board of Studies gratuitous (and somewhat moronic) weakness for Postmodern ambiguity, and part of it can be attributed to the desire to find a unique form of expression. The Major Work allows students the room to be emotionally creative or "conceptual" composers, rather than simply rational (oftentimes avant-garde creativity is mistaken for Postmodernism; and sometimes students simply throw in references to Postmodernism to garner extra marks). That being said, however, I believe that the best creative pieces (regardless of what the markers gave them) are the ones in which creativity is tempered by clarity and understanding - so that the work is not simply an ambiguous mess, but a harmonious union of form and ideas. Most teenagers, however, have a tendency towards angst in their writing (sometimes just in an attempt to make it seem "profound") and this becomes legitimised by relatavistic philosophies espoused by the Postmodern bandwagon.