did section3 need case studies?? (1 Viewer)

[shazabdazla]

you know how apparently we get an immediate band 4 for no case studies, well is that the same for question 26 (section3)(

 

[sneaky pete]

no.

 

[*~Dazed~*]

no... section 3 you just do based on the information provide and any of your knowledge... no case studies because they provide you with a business situation

 

[chris42]

yup, don't need one in section 3, but always use one in section 4.

 

[ripbong11]

no u didnt need 1 4 section 3 coz it didnt ask for 1
it always says at da top of da question whether u need one or not ... in the rue brick.

 

[hipsta_jess]

I read the rubric during the exams to make sure, i was kinda concerned...but nah, you dont need them for section 3.

 

[PG5]

nah you don't need 1
i immediately checked as well....
i've learnt my lesson from the trials!

 

[hipsta_jess]

Originally posted by natstar
it didnt have to say to use a case study in the actual question, it could have in the rubric. Same case as last year

yeah, but did you even read my post? i quite clearly stated that in the rubric it had NOTHING about using case studies for q 26

 

[truly-in-bliss]

section 3 = no case study

section 4 = case study/studies

 

[karnevil]

Yeah 26 was stimulus-based

interesting how they stopped putting "use a case study" in the question of Section IV after 2001....

 

[chris42]

Originally posted by karnevil

interesting how they stopped putting "use a case study" in the question of Section IV after 2001....

Yup it's like english, they assume you to put in language in the essays in english, and now business studies they assume to use a case study in the last section.

 

[ezzy85]

theyll be like english when they expect you to have one in all sections and they take it out of the rubric. that would be interesting.

 

[shazabdazla]

yeah....section 4.....i'm doomed....