• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Differentiating Logs (1 Viewer)

Timske

Sequential
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
794
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2016
Yes, quite Lol

My teacher helped me with this question and she went from:
logx-x^2 + 1 - x to
logx - 2x + 1

Im just not sure where the x^2 went...
However, she still got the right answer
d/dx lnx - x^2 + 1 - x = -2x + 1/x - 1 ,
 

Coookies

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
472
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Where did the 1/x come from?

Also, isn't ln for loge? Just wondering...
 

Timske

Sequential
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
794
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2016
loge = ln


d/dx ln(fx) = f'x/fx
hence, d/dx lnx = 1/x

logx-x^2 + 1 - x

d/dx logx = 1/x
d/dx -x^2 = -2x
d/dx 1 = 0
d/dx -x = -1

:. -2x + 1/x -1
Log(x) = ln(x) = loge(x)
 
Last edited:

Coookies

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
472
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Thanks!
I saw logx-x^2 as a whole thing. Didn't know you could separate them.

For Q10, is the differentiation (1-lnx)/x^2 right?
If so, when I make it equal 0, I get lnx=1 and then I don't know what to do.
 

Timske

Sequential
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
794
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2016
Thanks!
I saw logx-x^2 as a whole thing. Didn't know you could separate them.

For Q10, is the differentiation (1-lnx)/x^2 right?
If so, when I make it equal 0, I get lnx=1 and then I don't know what to do.
Lnx=1 get rid of ln by multiplying by e

elnx = e
x=e
 

Coookies

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
472
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Would they expect a maths adv student to do that?
Multiplying is much less complicated lol!
 

Coookies

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
472
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
One last question, how would I test it? lol, whats on either side of e?
 

D94

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
4,423
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Would they expect a maths adv student to do that?
Multiplying is much less complicated lol!
Yes, of course. What do you mean "multiplying"? There isn't multiplying :s To remove the logarithm, you take the exponents of both sides; that's the best method.
 

Coookies

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
472
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
So once I've raised them both, how do I get to x=e?

& I tried that but its all increasing (answer says max)
 

D94

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
4,423
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
So once I've raised them both, how do I get to x=e?

& I tried that but its all increasing (answer says max)
eloge(x) = e1

Hm, it sounds like you haven't been given a good explanation yet. One of the most important concepts is to raise log by e or to raise e by log; they are sort of like inverses of each other, and can cancel each other out. But, not like multiplication/division, they are powers of each other. (You're going to need a better explanation of the whole log and e relation, because it's too easy to just take these things for granted)

Anyway, it should be a maximum; let x = 2, y' = (1 - ln(2))/4 > 0, and when x = 3, y' = (1 - ln(3))/9 < 0.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top