inasero
Reborn
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2002
- Messages
- 2,497
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2003
Done what?BradCube said:Oh oh, now you've done it ... snap
Done what?BradCube said:Oh oh, now you've done it ... snap
Why?Schroedinger said:... Are you ... are you serious?
You officially lose your knowledge of science pass.
No you didn't, and even with our current technology (unless we develop the ability to overcome the hayflick limit and totally rig our bodies to stop producing reactive oxygen species), living beyond ~100 years is impossible.inasero said:or you could actually believe it and accept that they did live around 1000 years no? and i explained how they could have lived that long already.
BradCube said:Oh oh, now you've done it ... snap
They were meant to exercise their free will- to respect and honour God because it was their choice and not because they didn't know any other way. It's like...why have children if you know they'll be naughty? You want to be in a relationship with them and for them to truly appreciate you.boris said:Why give them freewill if they're not meant to exercise it. Surely God knew giving them free will, that they would use it.
If he could anticipate they would disobey him, why give it to them?
When my kid is naughty, I punish him appropriately.inasero said:They were meant to exercise their free will- to respect and honour God because it was their choice and not because they didn't know any other way. It's like...why have children if you know they'll be naughty? You want to be in a relationship with them and for them to truly appreciate you.
how can you say with certainty that people didn't actually live to that ripe old age? what makes my claims so much more ridiculous than yours?Captain Gh3y said:jesus h. fucking christ on a bicycle built for two
my year 9's have a better understanding of the nature of science than you do
All that I was really pointing out was that, regardless of people's current moral beliefs, this does not disprove objective morality - since objective morality is independent of what people believe.3unitz said:hmm, don't really understand you'll have to restate. i believe we have a moral law, its universal, and we base our right and wrong, most of society's laws, religions, and decisions on it... but whereas you might believe its divinely inspired, i believe its a consequence of evolution.
fuck you, just for looking at that woman with lust in your eye, i'm creating smallpoxboris said:When my kid is naughty, I punish him appropriately.
I don't inflict disease upon him.
please read my previous replyboris said:When my kid is naughty, I punish him appropriately.
I don't inflict disease upon him.
telomere replication, just for one thing off the top of my headinasero said:how can you say with certainty that people didn't actually live to that ripe old age? what makes my claims so much more ridiculous than yours?
Yeah and I don't get it.inasero said:please read my previous reply
How is being a doctor going againt God's supposed righteous anger? Are you arguing on the basis that death and disease are inflicted on us by God? Cos if so, I've responded to that argument already.Schroedinger said:"That doesn't explain why sin has generally increased in line with increased life spans in the western world, assuredly disease would just get worse and worse"
EDIT: How could you ethically be a doctor when it is going against God's righteous anger? Seems like a contradiction.
Well God had to have inflicted it. If it was not present until Adam and Eve disobeyed God, where did it come from?inasero said:How is being a doctor going againt God's supposed righteous anger? Are you arguing on the basis that death and disease are inflicted on us by God? Cos if so, I've responded to that argument already.
Going out on a limb here, but I am guessing that if Adam and Eve didn't disobey God, none of these would exist and we'd be perfectly, happy little vegemites.ur_inner_child said:What is the difference between acts that are of God's will or punishment, and just actions/happenings that occur out of sheer chance or from a series of other events?
e.g.
HIV/AIDS/Cancer/Black Plague/Malaria/SARS/other noteable diseases
September 11th/Titanic/other man-made tragedies
El nino/volcano eruptions/hurricanes/earthquakes/tidal waves
Miscarriages/birth defects/disabilities
Death in the family
Rape
Incest
Breaking/fracturing a bone
Bad marks at uni
Running your shins into a table causing huge bruises
Wisdom teeth pain
Obesity
Insomnia
Back pain
Lactose intolerance
Getting rejected by your crush
That huge blind pimple on your forehead
List goes on? I just have to list anything bad?
That's a great question and I'm glad you asked. It's difficult to see how death and disease could have entered into this world and you might be inclined to think that God therefore inflicted these things on us poor little humans. The Bible also says,boris said:Yeah and I don't get it.
If God isn't vengeful, why would he inflict disease upon his creation. Why not just turn his back and ignore them, or smite them completely?
Inflicting disease seems like a pretty vengeful thing to do.
- that includes everything like our health, friends, family, material blessings etc. When mankind sinned in the Garden of Eden then effectively man was cut off God, as symbolised by being banished never to return. Also in Genesis it saysJames 1:17 said:Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows
but...Romans 3:23 said:for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God
John 3:16 said:"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life"