Those experiemnts are only widely accepted because people believe that those scientistis are qualified. What if they're not sure experiments can make things happen which are predicted but the explaination of how that happened is made up a theory. Clearly you dont believe in love or happiness or sadness or any emotion for that matter. You CAN'T give proof of those feelings you just have to take peoples word for it. Read the bible, pray a few times, see gods work and then get back to me.
HAHA. YOU, on the same card, cant give proof that god exists! Your just as bad! but you see, we have evidence, supporting our claims. We can prove that WW2 ended on the 7th of may, 1945. You cant prove that Jesus actually did the things he did. So, WW2 is a theory is it... Okay then. You need God, clearly. Your much more stupid than i anticipated.
You cant prove that God exists. Your Bible is not proof. Read the start of the article.
The claim here is that the religious text (Bible, Quran, etc) proves that God exists. This argument makes the fallacy of begging the question (or circular reasoning). When the argument is set out clearly this becomes obvious:
How do we know God exists?
God exists because the Bible says so.
Why should we believe the Bible?
Because the Bible is the word of God.
How do we know God exists?
God exists because the Bible says so.
Why should we believe the Bible?
Because the Bible is the word of God.
How do we know God exists?
(etc, ad infinitum.)
You cannot use the conclusion you are trying to prove (that God exists) as one of your premises. The premise “the Bible is the word of God” already assumes the truth of the conclusion.
Sorry, but your an idiot.