gottalovegatti said:
get a proper camera...nothing that small uses built in cameras that are any good. Not for a decent photo anyway. Phone cameras and all that jazz suck.
Your point has merit in the manner that the OP intends to print larger than 'usual' (expected from a camera phone) - hence IQ issues are amplified.
But it's all about a matter of convenience. The fact that he pursues an all-in-one device should allow one to infer that he seeks a level of portability and convenience not necessarily offered by a discrete digital camera.
Secondly, you'd be amazed at improvements in IQ lately for camera phones. Not as good as digicam, but not
that far off either.
I currently utilise about $10k worth of digital SLR camera equipment for my professional jobs, but there is no doubt for many situations, a camera phone may actually be more appropriate. For example, taking my $2,000 Canon 30D, $1,700 17-55 f/2.8 lens and $700 580EX external flash out on a Friday night certainly gets me razor-sharp shots of social subjects in absolutely dreadful ambience lighting, but I really would prefer not to. A camera phone is often far more appropriate.