MedVision ad

ECON111 Assignment (1 Viewer)

jinghuang

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I'm afraid I have different thinking on the last part of question2. In this question, As the totol utility loss due to tax is 46 unit, but the total tax earns by government is 56. As the government will use the proceeds of the tax to finance public works, so I think the community is better off.
 

jinghuang

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
CrashOveride said:
What do people think about 2.2 with the consumer spending?
I think the consumer spending depends on elasticity of the demand
 

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
jinghuang said:
I think the consumer spending depends on elasticity of the demand
why? elasticity can tell u that it will change eg. price increase means consumer spending will fall...but by how much? elasticty cant tell you that ?
 

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
jinghuang said:
I'm afraid I have different thinking on the last part of question2. In this question, As the totol utility loss due to tax is 46 unit, but the total tax earns by government is 56. As the government will use the proceeds of the tax to finance public works, so I think the community is better off.
How did u get the DWL as 46units ?? I got much lower.
 

Sweet_Lemon

Final Sem'
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
1,447
Location
Metro SYD
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
the DWL is bout 6
Charity in kind = give poors anykind of *stuff* rather than money
Q4...NASTY LITTLE ****
 

jinghuang

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
CrashOveride said:
How did u get the DWL as 46units ?? I got much lower.
the loss in consumer surplus is 15.5 and the loss in producer surplus is 30.5
 

Sweet_Lemon

Final Sem'
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
1,447
Location
Metro SYD
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
jinghuang said:
the loss in consumer surplus is 15.5 and the loss in producer surplus is 30.5
tat's tax revenue govt redistributing into the community for watever work tat is..and 6 is the deadweight loss...as in the loss tat is inveitable to the socity without any meaning...where's our money GONE >.<
 
Last edited:

Sweet_Lemon

Final Sem'
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
1,447
Location
Metro SYD
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
for Q4, i'm not sure if i'm thinking clearly... i guess, we not suppose to discuss each part separately rite? since it says that all three statements are profitable. But maybe i'm wrong >.<
 

jinghuang

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Sweet_Lemon said:
tat's tax revenue govt redistributing into the community for watever work tat is..and 6 is the deadweight loss...as in the loss tat is inveitable to the socity without any meaning...where's our money GONE >.<
how did you work out ur DWL?
 

Sweet_Lemon

Final Sem'
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
1,447
Location
Metro SYD
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
its the triangular area...the ones u said are consumer + supplier share of tax exclude DWL
 

jinghuang

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Sweet_Lemon said:
its the triangular area...the ones u said are consumer + supplier share of tax exclude DWL
I agree with u that it won't be better off, but i still jave different value of DWl.
the difference between the loss of total surplus and tax revenue is the DWL.
i think the loss in cosumer surplus is 0.5*14*(50/3-12)-0.5*17*(50/3-11)=-15.5
the loss in producer surplus is 0.5*12*(2+14)-0.5*11*(6+17)=-30.5
and total tax revenue is 4*14=56
so DWL=?
 
Last edited:

pb

Inside The Hollow
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
775
Location
Westie!
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
well for 1 i got d....?
and to explain it, i was told that it was fixed costs spread over increasing production for economies of scale.... but i still couldnt do it.
... but i'd already done it as to increase total profit with fixed costs, you gotta increase total revenue, by increasing prices where demand is elastic.... but now im scared thats wrong cuz then i'd have to redo it! :(



also... help for q5? i have noooo idea how to do it :S
 

missemjay

New Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
25
Location
Seaforth NSW
Isn't it obvious that he would want to irrigate all of his farm using all the water. Why do you need isoquants to show this? isnt this just common sense?
This assignment is so fricken hard!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top