ENGL1000 vs ENGL1007? (1 Viewer)

[el gwapo]

^ I'd love to do that, but there seems to be no way of circumnavigating these shit junior ENGL courses. I asked Will Christie about it and apparently I need a good reason to dodge these English major prerequisites - I don't think "I thought 1007 was dull, and I don't think 1000, 1002 or 1045 will be any better" is a valid reason.

Btw, I was hardheaded the last time I posted here. You guys are right. This unit was rubbish especially in the marking of assessments.

 

[jayadore]

LOL.

English isn't that bad! Academic writing was a waste of time I admit, but it was still better than 1007. I think choosing 1008 would probably have been better, except you had to do a gazillion readings.

 

[jokerman]

so what exactly is so shit terrifying about ENGL1007?

Oh.. nothing.. now that all the DAMAGE IS DONE after exams. What a load of crap.

 

[Nebuchanezzar]

I learned nothing from ENGL1000

I learned to not apply techniques from ENGL1000 into my essays, as I got better marks in essays in previous years.

Subject blows. I would have much rather done 1007.

 

[lapin.mignon]

BS BS BS in 1000 got me an HD

WHOO!

8DDD

I didn't even start my essay until 4 hours AFTER it was due and handed it in the next day, running into my tutor on the way... <_<;;

Thank God, I fulfilled that Lib. Studies prerequisite...