estimate raw marks (1 Viewer)

[ballin]

that exam was pretty crappy, what do you guys think you'll get

23/25 ww1

22/25 russia

22/25 trotsky

18/25 cold war

85/100

 

[historykidd]

25/25 WW1
Germany 25/25
Speer 24/25
Pacific 25/25

Raw mark 99.

 

[Ademir]

i feel i did okay overall. not brilliant but not crap either

 

[mzduxx2006]

i feel i did okay overall. not brilliant but not crap either

hm i feel if i recieve a pass i shall be extatic

 

[mzduxx2006]

25/25 WW1
Germany 25/25
Speer 24/25
Pacific 25/25

Raw mark 99.

ahemm...yes let me know how that goes wont u?

 

[crees]

25/25 WW1
Germany 25/25
Speer 24/25
Pacific 25/25

Raw mark 99.

i definitely got that too. lol wat happened to speer only write 12pgs did you

 

[trentles]

sources 25
germany 22
speer 22
arab israeli 15

84

 

[mrated96]

25/25 WW1
Germany 25/25
Speer 24/25
Pacific 25/25

Raw mark 99.

Are u serious u little prick. which questions did u do for pacific and germany and what school do u go to

 

[mufti]

does any one know about scaling for modern? what would a raw mark of 85 become? and 90?

 

[WTF!bbq]

I'm guessing a raw mark of 80, round 20/25 for each section, probably more for Speer/Germany and less for WW1/WW2 though.

 

[.kate]

get fucked all of you.
as if you're going to be able to estimate your marks-
COULD YOU BE ANY MORE RETARDED?

fucking losers get a life.


but for the record - i kicked ALL YOUR ARSES.
fuckwits

 

[frozenindesire]

get fucked all of you.
as if you're going to be able to estimate your marks-
COULD YOU BE ANY MORE RETARDED?

fucking losers get a life.


but for the record - i kicked ALL YOUR ARSES.
fuckwits

haha, yes. i'm sure you kicked all our arses. hence this violent display. i'm sure the only reason you're so angry is because you did so much better than us. you sound like a perfectly functional individual too. wow, how lucky are you?

 

[WTF!bbq]

get fucked all of you.
as if you're going to be able to estimate your marks-
COULD YOU BE ANY MORE RETARDED?

fucking losers get a life.


but for the record - i kicked ALL YOUR ARSES.
fuckwits

snort.

go jump, sugar <3

 

[trentles]

get fucked all of you.
as if you're going to be able to estimate your marks-
COULD YOU BE ANY MORE RETARDED?

fucking losers get a life.


but for the record - i kicked ALL YOUR ARSES.
fuckwits

you sound REALLY REALLY butch...its hard to tell through a computer screen...but really butch

 

[.kate]

what are you snorting.. sugar? is it? did i get it right? su-garrr? emphasis on the sug? or the r?.

p.s why are you so fat?

 

[.kate]

it's Sugar right? is it? did i get it right? su-garrr? emphasis on the sug? or the r?.
What are you snorting?


p.s why are you so fat?

 

[historykidd]

haha your awesome kate.

 

[WTF!bbq]

oh double post some more, noob.

as for your question, more cushion for the pushin', obviously. don't you know anything, you slag?

_{p.s. is it against board rules to feed the trolls? i'm so bored. and fat, apparently}

P.P.S. ANYWAY. Is that whole thing about 25-40% historiography being the basis for a band 6 answer for real? (figure pulled from another thread but still). Does that count for the WWI section? Just figured I'd un-hijack a perfectly legitimate thread.

 

[navelj]

25/25 WW1
Germany 25/25
Speer 24/25
Pacific 25/25

Raw mark 99.

So you did war in the Pacific - which question? I did occupied territories because the Catholic trial paper had the exact same question and i got 25/25 for it. Just to let you know, i do all three history subjects aswell so i wouldn't boast......

 

[extraordinary07]

So you did war in the Pacific - which question? I did occupied territories because the Catholic trial paper had the exact same question and i got 25/25 for it. Just to let you know, i do all three history subjects aswell so i wouldn't boast......

same, history is a bitch.

i did occupied territories and i started poorly but it got better, i reckon 22-23 is what ill get at most.

speer and core were very good, nothing less then 23.

germany eh, culture, give me a 22 at best.