Depends on what you would say is 'evil'...Lukybear said:I hope this thread is really a joke... I mean cmon intellectual eugenics, you cant say the intelligent are more "good." Their intelect may be used for evil...
yeahExphate said:Faggots be overlooking the posts i made.
That would only occur with a deep-seeded hereditary mental problem or psychological trauma caused by the environment in which they grew up in. The intellect itself doesn't drive someone to 'evil'.Lukybear said:I hope this thread is really a joke... I mean cmon intellectual eugenics, you cant say the intelligent are more "good." Their intelect may be used for evil...
Depends on what criteria you use.poisonives said:the overaching irony of this thread is that the OP and all who 'agreed' in the polls would probably be classified as idiots
I left the house yesterday.bobbo12 said:That way, only the rich could afford it, and generally the rich are smart.
moll.
For the love of all that is holy ..... That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read.....Have you EVER left your house? Or read a newspaper in the past 8 years? Or watched the news in the past 8 years? Speaking of weeding people out, how about those that can't spell or use ebonics and close minded bigots? You would be at the top of the list champ, and good fucking riddance.....
I only just noticed this. That's very interesting. So racism on the grounds of mental capacity is technically justified.Graney said:Average racial differences in intelligence may well be intractable and partially genetic.
It's a hypothesis supported by many prominent scientists. It's entirely possible and reasonable.
Though ofcourse, even if group differences in intelligence are proven, it doesn't mean we should invalidate the universal nature of human rights.
Lol.veloc1ty said:Smooth 1 month bump.