• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Evoloution Help (1 Viewer)

TBK11

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
499
Location
Market City
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
hi everyone

im stuck on this question if someone could give me some pointers id more than appreciate it.

Why is Darwin's Theory accepted and Lamarck's Theory not accepted Give Reason to Justify your response

i know that Lamarck's theory doesn't make sense but i need to justify why could someone give me some pointers id really appreciate it Thanks
 

cHoke-meh

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
51
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Well Darwin's theory was simply "survival of the fittest" right? So those who adapted to their surrounding environments survived, and lived to produce the next generation. In effect, they mutated to change.
Lamarck's theory instead talked about how the individuals of each generation adapted and then passed these adaptations down to their offspring. Just quickly searching a bit more on Wikipedia shows that it's called "soft-inheritance".

Also, isn't Mendel's theory of genetics the one that is accepted? Since Darwinism is basically obsolete due to nothing about the genetical make up?

edit: huh, i didn't even really answer your question properly. Whoops...

edit edit: "After publication of Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection, the importance of individual efforts in the generation of adaptation was considerably diminished."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckism xD
 

Just.Snaz

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
300
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Darwin's theory of evolution states that species change over a long period of time. Basically through the concept of 'survival of the fittest' or also known as natural selection.

Lamarck's theory suggests use and disuse. That is, if for example, an animal didn't use a third arm, the next generation would not have the third arm. What's used is passed to the offspring and what isn't used is not.

Darwin's theory is more accepted. Lamarck's is not because well, I'm guessing there are some animals out there that have certain characteristics that are not used and still passed onto the offspring. However, to me it's just logical that Lamarck's theory is rejected.. don't know how to justify it unless I knew examples of those animals.

Darwin's theory however is accepted because of fossil evidence and heaps of other stuff.

I know this from year 12 biology btw so I'm not sure what you need for the school certificate.
 

TBK11

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
499
Location
Market City
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
cHoke-meh said:
Well Darwin's theory was simply "survival of the fittest" right? So those who adapted to their surrounding environments survived, and lived to produce the next generation. In effect, they mutated to change.
Lamarck's theory instead talked about how the individuals of each generation adapted and then passed these adaptations down to their offspring. Just quickly searching a bit more on Wikipedia shows that it's called "soft-inheritance".

Also, isn't Mendel's theory of genetics the one that is accepted? Since Darwinism is basically obsolete due to nothing about the genetical make up?

edit: huh, i didn't even really answer your question properly. Whoops...

edit edit: "After publication of Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection, the importance of individual efforts in the generation of adaptation was considerably diminished."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckism xD
Thanks for your help

Just.Snaz said:
Darwin's theory of evolution states that species change over a long period of time. Basically through the concept of 'survival of the fittest' or also known as natural selection.

Lamarck's theory suggests use and disuse. That is, if for example, an animal didn't use a third arm, the next generation would not have the third arm. What's used is passed to the offspring and what isn't used is not.

Darwin's theory is more accepted. Lamarck's is not because well, I'm guessing there are some animals out there that have certain characteristics that are not used and still passed onto the offspring. However, to me it's just logical that Lamarck's theory is rejected.. don't know how to justify it unless I knew examples of those animals.

Darwin's theory however is accepted because of fossil evidence and heaps of other stuff.

I know this from year 12 biology btw so I'm not sure what you need for the school certificate.
thank you both it was just for a question i wasn't too sure about it but i got it now thanks alot for your answers really appreciated :)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top