It's not actually the engines that cause it to propel back. As Helstar said, the gravitational influence of the planet rotates the velocity vector of the spacecraft relative to the planet into a direction which is aligned with the planetery motion. Since energy is conserved, the speed of the spacecraft relative to the planet is unaffected, only its direction changes.airie said:So what would the shuttle be propelled back, instead of being captured by the planet? Is it just the engines inside at work?
This slingshot effect sounds like it's at work too when, say, a small asteroid, is being 'kicked out' by a planet. How is this (and with the shuttle too) different in the case where the asteroid is being captured instead? Does it have anything to do with the initial speed of the asteroid?zeropoint said:The gravitational influence of the planet rotates the velocity vector of the spacecraft relative to the planet into a direction which is aligned with the planetery motion. Since energy is conserved, the speed of the spacecraft relative to the planet is unaffected, only its direction changes.
No problemairie said:Thanks
Interesting question. Well, from my (limited) understanding of orbital mechanics, the condition for the two bodies to execute a stable orbit is that their total energy is less than zero. In practise you would calculate this asairie said:This slingshot effect sounds like it's at work too when, say, a small asteroid, is being 'kicked out' by a planet. How is this (and with the shuttle too) different in the case where the asteroid is being captured instead? Does it have anything to do with the initial speed of the asteroid?
What do you mean?Raginsheep said:Im pretty sure its to do with orbital shapes.
So you're saying that if the sum of the kinetic energy of both the planet and the spacecraft is less than the attraction between them, the spacecraft will be captured? Why would the kinetic energy of the planet be involved as well, instead of just that of the spacecraft? I just don't quite understand why the kinetic energy of the planet will have a role in determining if the spacecraft is captured or not. Am I allowed to picture it as, (excuse the inexact diction) if the kinetic energy of the planet is too big, regardless of how small that of the spacecraft is, it will still not be captured since the planet will just "run away", not "bringing the spacecraft with it" as its kinetic energy overcomes the attraction between them?zeropoint said:Interesting question. Well, from my (limited) understanding of orbital mechanics, the condition for the two bodies to execute a stable orbit is that their total energy is less than zero. In practise you would calculate this as
1/2 m_1 v_1^2 + 1/2 m_2 v_2^2 - G m_1 m_2 / r^2
where v_1 and v_2 are the orbital speeds of the objects relative to some stationary coordinate system (such as the sun). If the speeds of the planet and spacecraft are low enough to make that number less than zero, then the spacecraft will enter a stable orbit about the planet, rather than being slingshotted.
I meant to take an example of a moon of one of the planets in the solar system or something, but can't exactly remember which now Anyhow, would it help setting up the picture, if the scenario is this: a binary pair comes near the planet, one of them is captured by the planet while the other is sent out of the universe? Why aren't they both captured, or both experience the slingshot effect?zeropoint said:I'm trying to imagine how an asteroid could get `kicked out' of a planetary orbit but I'm just not seeing it. Unless I'm mistaken, if the initial energy of the planet-asteroid system is less than zero, then this energy shouldn't change over time, so the asteroid should never escape, unless of course some external source of energy is introduced, in which case the asteroid will escape if it reaches escape velocity (total energy goes greater than or equal to zero).
James