good point, I'm off to practice my indonesian.Imagine how rich society would be if everyone on this forum invested their mental capacity in productive activities in their spare time
good point, I'm off to practice my indonesian.Imagine how rich society would be if everyone on this forum invested their mental capacity in productive activities in their spare time
+1hmm, i agree with everything.
yes id say that attacking govt policy does thische
abbott is a phony populist
the only thing his party does is constantly attack the govt. policies
without offering clearly defined policies of his own party
and remember its not about getting the best party in, its about keeping the worst party out
Sounds fictional.sounds beautiful
But government is comprised of inherently flawed human beings and so will never fit your idea of "legitimate", no matter how small and powerless you try to make them.quick note to sylvester's comment: government is not a situation where people wth human nature try to counteract human nature, it is people with human nature trying to counteract ethical wrongs ie rape or murder (we are talking about a legitimate government not the type we have today).
??So saying it is humans trying to counteract humans is obviously nonsensense or else governments would be counteracting any form of a human being using their rational faculty or feeling any kind of emotions, that would be attempting to counteract human nature
sigh...Sounds fictional.
???imo a social democratic govt is the lesser evil
Costello > Turnball > AbbottWould you rather Costello or Turnbull?
yeah but a stateless government would mean that more remote areas most likely won't get the funding they would if there are states, NT for example.i guess a stateless society could be achieveable ...only on a small scale
imo a social democratic govt is the lesser evil
yeah but a stateless government would mean that more remote areas most likely won't get the funding they would if there are states, NT for example.
Wow.Costello > Turnball > Abbott
yeah but a stateless government would mean that more remote areas most likely won't get the funding they would if there are states, NT for example.