• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

FuelWatch 'dead in the water' (1 Viewer)

Rafy

Retired
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
10,719
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2008
FuelWatch running on empty

THE Federal Government's planned FuelWatch system to regulate petrol prices appears dead in the water after a key balance-of-power senator decided to vote against the legislation.

The South Australian anti-gambling campaigner Senator Nick Xenophon revealed late yesterday he would not support the scheme because it would hurt small independent petrol retailers and could actually push up petrol prices.

The senator's stance will sink FuelWatch because the Government has to secure the votes of all minor parties to pass the legislation through the new Senate.

This is a big blow for the Government - already under attack over its handling of the economy and preparing for the return of Parliament for the crucial spring session in three weeks.

The Government won office by promising to exert downward pressure on the cost-of-living.

FuelWatch, which is not planned to come into operation until December, has been criticised since it was announced as a key element of the Government's response to rising prices.[...]
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
That's the problem with lefties - they don't consider things on their merits, but rather how the fall into the some black and white ideological dichotomy. Actually that's the problem with a lot of righties, too. Anyway, while I admire the attempt to regulate the price of oil at the source (because it is a rather out of control market), that source seems too volatile to pinpoint for an attempt like this to be successful. I'm not an economist, though.

Moreover, I want oil prices to rise so people use their brains more than their cars.

Granted, it's still wrong to make the assessment that "all the arguments we used against it were valid." simply because Xenophon vetoed it, as cool as his name is.
 

Snaykew

:)
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
538
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Holy shit his name is Xenophon? MAKE HIM THE FUHRER OF AUSTRALIA!
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Mandate blocked. Dissolve senate. Well may we say etc
 

spiny norman

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
884
Location
Rivo
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Slidey said:
Granted, it's still wrong to make the assessment that "all the arguments we used against it were valid." simply because Xenophon vetoed it, as cool as his name is.
Maybe all their arguments against it were that it won't get through the Senate?
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
spiny norman said:
Maybe all their arguments against it were that it won't get through the Senate?
Check and mate! :(
 

zstar

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
748
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Rudd the dud unable to get anything done anymore.
 

jb_nc

Google "9-11" and "truth"
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
5,391
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Exphate said:
If Rudd is so hell bent on reducing petrol prices, why not introduce a "government" line of petrol stations, to challenge the big providers. If he is so certain that they are rorting the public, the govt operations will have cheaper prices, leading to (you'd hope) reduced prices across the board.


No?

Insane idea, I know.
i don't think he's really a generalissimo
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top