• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

General McChrystal's sacking (1 Viewer)

Rothbard

Active Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2010
Messages
1,118
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
McChrystal is one motherfucking badass dude
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
oh free speech? That isn't in the constitution or nething.
Are you kidding me? If he had been gaoled or fined or ordered to do community service because of it then that would be an attack on free speech, when your fighting a war and you have a choice between two generals, one who will say helpful things and one who will not it isn't an attack on liberty to choose the one who will keep his mouth shut.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
722
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19:

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a19

When it says everyone, that includes McChrystal.
 
Last edited:

Rothbard

Active Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2010
Messages
1,118
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Dude he's a member of the Military, you sign away certain rights when you sign up, for the record.
 

speak

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
115
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Not really.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -
888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Source: Uniform Code of Military Justice
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
722
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
In McChrystal's case, a court-martial did not direct punishment. Obama did.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19:

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

When it says everyone, that includes McChrystal.
Yeah but he wasn't punished under the law like a criminal he was sacked from his job.
 

speak

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
115
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
He wasn't sacked. He resigned.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
722
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I actually think it's not about McChrystal. It's not about shutting him up or punishment for speaking up.

It's about making everybody else scared to speak up.
 

vanush

kdslkf
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
547
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
The General's comments were petulant. Any President would have done the same thing.

This is the military of the United States of America (and ignoring current wars, probably the last hope of the world). As you can imagine, the position entails a certain amount professionalism. The President has also stated correctly, debate is welcome but division is not.

And lol at framing this in terms of free speech
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
722
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
He said what he said because nobody else had the guts to do so.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
McChrystal has a right to freedom of speech, and Obama, as his employer, has a right to sack or reprimand him for violating a code of conduct.

It's that simple, so stop trying to make a big deal out of it Buchanan.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top