General Thoughts: English Standard Paper 2 (Modules) (1 Viewer)

[Rafy]

Share your thoughts on the 2009 English Standard Modules exam. What aspects of the paper did you like and dislike? Did you consider it a fair test of your abilities? Overall, how did you go and how did you find the exam as a whole?

 

[93070]

i thought it was pretty good.
i didn't like section 2 though, I did witness and didn't expect to be asked about one character in particular - i had kind of expected a clash of cultures and question and was a bit thrown off by it.
but overall, i thought i wasn't a bad paper

 

[-may-cat-]

what were the text types?

 

[Jack Burton]

didn't think they would ask for two speeches and one related owell

 

[Sechs]

Section 2 threw me off but i aced the rest i reckon

 

[BlueCatBulletCD]

It was pretty decent. I was happy with it. All essays

 

[MrDimple]

hmmm i thought it was a good paper.

I wanna ask, i didnt do the text that we done through the year, i did something else
like i didn't do tom brennan but i did billy elliot is that allowed cause i knew more on billy elliot than the novel.

 

[woo217]

It was pretty decent. I was happy with it. All essays

woooooo no more fucking english for the rest of our lives! fuck yes time to burn my english books

 

[Hadn]

Yeh I found the paper much easier then I expected. Oh well best to expect the worst and be prepared eh? And they asked for at least one related text for Julius Caesar... I was quite happy, because I only had one real good one anyway

 

[BlueCatBulletCD]

hmmm i thought it was a good paper.

I wanna ask, i didnt do the text that we done through the year, i did something else
like i didn't do tom brennan but i did billy elliot is that allowed cause i knew more on billy elliot than the novel.

I'm pretty sure that's fine

 

[Phoenix Fury]

Yeats was good, Julie was good, Frankenstein and Bladerunner was poohole. Overall I think it was good.

 

[ajdlinux]

Section 2 was particularly difficult to write about, completely unexpected really. Other than that, I thought the exam was pretty good - my crap mark is entirely my own fault, not the Board's, this time.

 

[Dr. Zoidberg]

happy as Mod A and C were exactly like my memorised essays whilst being prepared for character analysis as they asked that in 2001 i think.

 

[mystiques4]

Witness was a messed up question.

 

[Norcinu]

Hmm, I got thrown off with section 2 characterization question as well. I started off a bit wrong but was able to adapt for it.

 

[Bootawa_Boy]

Yer i was thrown a bit by Witness but was glad that all 3 were essays

 

[00iCon]

the paper gets 5 stars, i get negative 4 stars for my answers.

 

[lollylover]

i liked it
cept module b was kinda gay
but overall, i think they were pretty good questions

 

[rokkuguhyo]

Section I was fine, Section II was really unexpected (I had to change so many parts of my essay), and I had a mental blank during Section III. Damn Billy Elliott. :mad1:

 

[rowdyroddy]

what were the text types?

x3 essays