proringz said:
I talked about Edison, as Westinghouse wasn't really a scientist. But I talked about how Westinghouse was an 'external influence' to Edison.
i was the same - started with westinghousel agreeing with Q then reealised - WESTINGHOUSE WASNT A SCIENTIST
so i changed, disagreed with Q, state external factors did NOT have a major impact on Scientists using edison, cause despite external influences such as Westinghouse, and the apparent advantages in DC, not only did he INVEST in DC with is own money, but he CONTINUED TTO MAKE HIS INVENTIONS IN DC, thus, despite AC winning in the end, the external factors did not influence Edison as a scientist
that Q i thought was dodgy in that - if u chose rocket exploration, u got hte scientist part right on, but its kinda hard to link them to 'external forces/impacts', wheras if u chose power distrribution, u could agree or disagree with the Q, but cant really elaborate on the role of the SCIENTISTS
wouldve been better a straight 3 marker - 'edison vs westinghouse debate' AND another 3 marker 'explain at least TWO contributions of a rocket scinetist' - that would amke up the 6 marks!