Hard test compared to other year? (1 Viewer)

[Michaelmoo]

Hmmmm. If they required direct reference to the FWA that would be pretty unfair imo. It would advantage the people do legal and/or eco.

Anyway.

 

[jovceski123]

hey guys, because it was a fucked up test n the state average will be low does that mean it will scale slightly better than last year?

 

[freaksoutalot]

definatly easier deadset

 

[NightWingkz]

.... for me section 2 was hardest.... so much ethical stuff....=[
and not much management and ER and fiance .....
the two 6 mark questions were challenging... and i think i stuff one up...sigh

 

[kning818100]

wtf u serious? no one put new organisation and behavioural structure influences for ER in section 3??? omg....

and yes the question on misleading advertising was bullshit, i see no probs with that ads. omg, so stupid.

 

[Michaelmoo]

wtf u serious? no one put new organisation and behavioural structure influences for ER in section 3??? omg....

and yes the question on misleading advertising was bullshit, i see no probs with that ads. omg, so stupid.

- "Fits all your shopping material": Um I don't think so
- Advertisement has goods in the environmentally responsible bag: Customers can be misleaded to think the goods come with the bag. There was no indication (fine print etc) that the goods don't come with the bag.

 

[sickk]

i put the same about fits all your shopping - load of shit
and something about 100% environmentally friendly, its probably not 100% it might be a lesser impact ont he environment but there will still be an effect from production, wastes, litter etc

something long those lines

 

[deebarnz]

it was ok, i hated question 26, what did everyone do for their global marketing strategy?

 

[sickk]

everyone is talking about it under the section 3 sticky, everyone pretty much tossing up between global branding, standardisation and differention, market research and the 4p's

 

[spazamataz]

I loved this exam Except i'm not sure about some short answers, and yeah i can't remember much from it lol

 

[alex1992]

It did indeed seem to be quite a basic paper. No reason as to doubt a 60/60 for the m/c and s/a however, i was unable to recall the marketing plan or the financial planning cycle in the reports, as i did not have time to memorise the dubious syllabus.

 

[xxheersaletixx]

thought it was a good paper but FML case study question had to rush like a mofo coz i spent an hour on the report leaving me like 20 mins only

 

[shady145]

i put the same about fits all your shopping - load of shit
and something about 100% environmentally friendly, its probably not 100% it might be a lesser impact ont he environment but there will still be an effect from production, wastes, litter etc

something long those lines

hehe thats exactly what i put ^^, well not exactly but similar

 

[cata]

OMG!! In my opinion i thought it was a more challenging paper, well I enjoyed my trial exam better I wish the marks were swapped around!

All I can say for this one is that it was REALLY VERY RANDOM! I mean "what are the features of an employment contract" is that just one of those general questions or were there specifics things we had to include. Also i totally skipped while studying the "stock exchange" parts, then when it was reading time i was like "aww man why the heck did i skip it!"