kirabolton said:
I've actually changed my mind, i quite liked it in general. At first i was so pissed off about Snape but now that i think about it, it was a good move by rowling because nobody was expecting it. its pretty cliche that dumbledore died, but it was pretty damn sad that snape did it. i think the whole dumbledore not being so powerful and you know, dying and all, makes room for Harry to really step up and boy did he mature doing this book. yep. thats all i've got to say. oh and i agree that the ships were pretty fan fictiony, especially harrys sudden 'oh i love ginny'. it was kind of annoying.
I didn't know what upset me more - Dumbledore dieing or the fact Snape did it! Snape did not apper a cold, calculating Death Eater when he did it however - it's a lesser of two evils. And if you ask me, SlideRule has it right. Snape didn't defect to the dark side - he's working in his own interests.
He killed Dumbledore to protect Draco, that much was clear. The unbreakable vow he made to Narcissa, the apparent friendship they share, his protection of Draco throughout the book and during the battle, ensuring Draco was safe before himself. If Albus ad Seveus did not set the whole thing up, then Severus simply choose what he saw as a lesser of two evils - Dumbledore or Draco?
That said, this whole propechy was played down to Dumbeldore, it made me think - what if it alot more serious that we were led to believe? What if Draco is the 'One' they've spoken of? We know Lucius is apparently loyal, but from Spinners End, we saw Narcissa is prepared to defy Voldermort to protect her son (and husband I'd imagine), and it was also brought to our attention that Draco, like Harry, is much younger than his peers, perhaps he too was born in late July? Perhaps both Dumbeldore and Snape are aware of this and realised the need to sacrifice Dumbledore to save Draco and thus the wizarding world?
Perhaps there was more to this argument between Severus and Albus than Hagrid heard? While I liked Albus in this book more than ever (which I imagine was JKRs aim) I still got the distinct impression he was using both Severus and Harry from the begining of the book. Or perhaps this whole argument was staged within hearing distance of Hagrid? To lay the foundations for the rift between them? Perhaps killing Dumbledore saved not only Draco, but Severus as well? As may people have pointed out, Severus had plently of opportunity to kill Severus, but instead simply deflected curses, well aware the Order will decend upon them soon enough, not leaving time for games. He stoped the torture of Harry, saying he was for the Dark Lord, yet made no attempt to take him to LV.
I think Severus is either explicitly on the side of good - that Dumbledores' death was part of a greater plan - that there is more to this 'Half Blood Prince' than simply being the son of a halfblood witch - and that Harry will eventually kil him before realising what Severus has done. Or, more likely - Severus is loyal to nobody. He plays both sides, gaining what he can to protect those he cares about - Narcissa and Draco. It also has me questioning - are Severus and Narcissa more than just friends? Did the Blacks disaprove of such a relationship with a mere half blood? Was Narcissa's marriage to Lucius a sham to hide her relationship with Severus? Is Severus really (crossing into Severitus territory) Draco's natural father?
I think Albus begging Severus,
Please...Seveus.. was not Albus begging for his life. He's not afraid of death. Yes, he may have been heartbroken that his belief in Snape's loyalty had been shattered, but I'm more inclined to believe it was to save Draco, or perhaps Harry. Severus is too much of an anomoly to be decifed just yet - and he's too crafty and cunning - to much of a Slytherin in other words - to blindly allign himself to on side. He'll do whatever it takes to keep Draco and Narcissa alive.
I think his background may come into play next book too! I'm upset it's going to be another 2 years, however.