homosexuals (1 Viewer)

[qawe]

Getting rid of all religious affiliations with legal marriage is very practical though.
Sure, if you want to get married in a church or whatever, fine, but then religion is completely out of it, divorces are handled legally, etc.

what exactly are you suggesting?

 

[Aquawhite]

what exactly are you suggesting?

That religion be stripped from the ideology and definition of marriage. I think marriage is now, and forever should be, a legal and socially binding contract without religious affiliation. It should be at the discretion of the couple as to whether that binding relationship should involve a religion or the church.

It is a practical thing to do.

 

[qawe]

Gay marriage would stop the spread, as marriage is a monogamous relationship. Completely different.

really? if it's no longer between a man and a woman then why must it be monogamous.

that's why i don't take your advice below

Maybe you should get your head out of your religion's arse then say something.

 

[SnowFox]

Religion didnt even coin the term marriage. Its been around for ages.

 

[SnowFox]

really? if it's no longer between a man and a woman then why must it be monogamous.

A marriage is the ultimate form of commitment to a significant other. It would be assumed that the partners just fuck each others brains out.

 

[iwantfreeessays]

That religion be stripped from the ideology and definition of marriage. I think marriage is now, and forever should be, a legal and socially binding contract without religious affiliation. It should be at the discretion of the couple as to whether that binding relationship should involve a religion or the church.

It is a practical thing to do.

no, fascist, here is an idea. Why don't we just get the government out of marriage. So by getting religion out of marriage what does that even imply? To ban churches for marrying people? You are worse than hitler.

Also, if you are so anti- religon, can you please not be a hypocrite and drop 1/10 of your vocabulary. (this includes the days of the week) Thanks.

 

[qawe]

That religion be stripped from the ideology and definition of marriage. I think marriage is now, and forever should be, a legal and socially binding contract without religious affiliation. It should be at the discretion of the couple as to whether that binding relationship should involve a religion or the church.

It is a practical thing to do.

it's funny how you think humans have reached the apex of social values - legal polygamy and bestiality still to come - we're always improving in that regard

what would be the point in that? more red tape?

isn't this already the case. i'm not being critical, but clarify

 

[jnney]

I guess we need to allow polygamous marriage now. The thing is, you won't see gays advocating for that. I am sick of their BS about equal rights when all they care about is whether or not some dumb government registry will get to have their stupid fake lesbian name written on it. Get over yourselves, no one cares. if you want to get married, just fucking do it. do you think the swat teams are going to come crashing into the wedding and forcibly stop it?? no.,.

BS? I think that's inconsiderate of you to say that.

I don't think gay marriage has been legalised yet.

 

[qawe]

no, fascist, here is an idea. Why don't we just get the government out of marriage. So by getting religion out of marriage what does that even imply? To ban churches for marrying people? You are worse than hitler.

Also, if you are so anti- religon, can you please not be a hypocrite and drop 1/10 of your vocabulary. (this includes the days of the week) Thanks.

good idea. separation of church and state.

 

[iwantfreeessays]

BS? I think that's inconsiderate of you to say that.

I don't think gay marriage has been legalised yet.

It is legal and has been for a long time. I am still waiting for the day that a swat team shoot up two lesbos getting married.

 

[qawe]

A marriage is the ultimate form of commitment to a significant other. It would be assumed that the partners just fuck each others brains out.

this is not according to the pro-gay side's logic. it's now purely about love

 

[SnowFox]

this is not according to the pro-gay lobby's logic. it's now purely about love (sexual)

Source.

 

[qawe]

Source.

this thread. i didn't mean lobby literally

 

[SnowFox]

This thread is no proof of homosexual marriage being based purely on fucking.

Moron.

 

[Riproot]

no, fascist, here is an idea. Why don't we just get the government out of marriage. So by getting religion out of marriage what does that even imply? To ban churches for marrying people? You are worse than hitler.

Also, if you are so anti- religon, can you please not be a hypocrite and drop 1/10 of your vocabulary. (this includes the days of the week) Thanks.

You are actually like one of the stupidest people ever.
If marriage isn't a government and legal thing then married couples wouldn't get the legal privileges they do. Every woman would be a single mother, etc.
Seriously, you're actually retarded. That doesn't make any sense at all.

 

[MysteryGenius]

this thread is a piece of stinky garbage

with a blob of poopy on top

 

[qawe]

this thread. i didn't mean lobby literally

ie there are no valid non-religious arguments (pretty unanimous) against gay marriage.
therefore it would be naive to think that there would be no move to polygamy (i can imagine all the arguments now, the usual + racist to muslims...), having thrown out religion
in fact, ur attempt to define marriage does not consider that this whole saga is about changing the definition, so ur definition would not be set in stone

 

[Riproot]

It is legal and has been for a long time. I am still waiting for the day that a swat team shoot up two lesbos getting married.

No. Get out. A civil union isn't a marriage.

this is not according to the pro-gay side's logic. it's now purely about love (sexual)

You're just a blind idiot. Honestly, get your head out of a ~2000 year old, fictional book.

 

[qawe]

This thread is no proof of homosexual marriage being based purely on fucking.

Moron.

ok what if i take back the sexual part. this would clarify what i meant.

 

[qawe]

No. Get out. A civil union isn't a marriage.

You're just a blind idiot. Honestly, get your head out of a ~2000 year old, fictional book.

what's the difference?