Matrix: 94.65 Actual ATAR: 94.35 Pretty close.
S Stephie-Rae Member Joined Mar 7, 2008 Messages 96 Gender Female HSC 2009 Dec 17, 2009 #121 Matrix: 94.65 Actual ATAR: 94.35 Pretty close.
M@ster P Member Joined Feb 9, 2008 Messages 619 Gender Male HSC 2009 Dec 17, 2009 #122 not that accurate Umax: 94.5 Sam: 94.6 actually: 93.65
ajdlinux Mod: ANU, ATAR/HSC Marks Joined Sep 15, 2006 Messages 1,890 Location Port Macquarie / Canberra Gender Male HSC 2009 Dec 17, 2009 #123 SAM, UMAX and Einstein all estimated between 93.15-93.25. I ended up with 93.05, so only 0.10-0.20 off.
SAM, UMAX and Einstein all estimated between 93.15-93.25. I ended up with 93.05, so only 0.10-0.20 off.
tanna Member Joined Dec 12, 2006 Messages 178 Location Sydney Gender Female HSC 2009 Dec 17, 2009 #124 SAM: 97.45 Umax: 98 ATAR: 98.05 They underestimated me! Shame on them...
Akaru-Hime Rawr~ Joined Oct 16, 2007 Messages 35 Location Sydney Gender Female HSC 2009 Dec 17, 2009 #125 UMAX was unbelievable. Predicted 99.85 ... which was exactly what I got. >.< SAM was a little disappointing. It predicted 99.75 UAI, which wasn't too far off I suppose. =3
UMAX was unbelievable. Predicted 99.85 ... which was exactly what I got. >.< SAM was a little disappointing. It predicted 99.75 UAI, which wasn't too far off I suppose. =3
A alice09 New Member Joined Jan 3, 2009 Messages 17 Gender Female HSC 2009 Dec 17, 2009 #126 einstein 09 was right on the money 4 me with 99.10 and it was my highest predictor sam and umax underestimated with 98.75 and 98.95
einstein 09 was right on the money 4 me with 99.10 and it was my highest predictor sam and umax underestimated with 98.75 and 98.95
annabackwards <3 Prophet 9 Joined Jun 14, 2008 Messages 4,670 Location Sydney Gender Female HSC 2009 Dec 17, 2009 #127 UMAX estimate - 99.05 JUAI estimate - 99.20 Einstein estimate - 99.25 SAM estimate - 99.00 Actual ATAR - 99.00
UMAX estimate - 99.05 JUAI estimate - 99.20 Einstein estimate - 99.25 SAM estimate - 99.00 Actual ATAR - 99.00
ajdlinux Mod: ANU, ATAR/HSC Marks Joined Sep 15, 2006 Messages 1,890 Location Port Macquarie / Canberra Gender Male HSC 2009 Dec 18, 2009 #129 Does anyone know the difference in the calculation methods used by each of the calculators? They're all based on the same underlying UAC scaling statistics, so why is it that they can be sometimes significantly different from each other?
Does anyone know the difference in the calculation methods used by each of the calculators? They're all based on the same underlying UAC scaling statistics, so why is it that they can be sometimes significantly different from each other?
eloxquence Member Joined May 10, 2008 Messages 43 Location Sydney Gender Female HSC 2009 Dec 18, 2009 #130 sorry to bump this thread with my less than 97 atar... but UMAX said 91.85 and thats what i got. sam said 90.85
sorry to bump this thread with my less than 97 atar... but UMAX said 91.85 and thats what i got. sam said 90.85