The four main mechanisms by which microorganisms exhibit resistance to antimicrobials are:Antibiotic resistance is the ability of a microorganism to withstand the effects of antibiotics. It is a specific type of drug resistance. Antibiotic resistance evolves naturally via natural selection acting upon random mutation, but it can also be engineered by applying an evolutionary stress on a population. Once such a gene is generated, bacteria can then transfer the genetic information in a horizontal fashion (between individuals) by plasmid exchange. If a bacterium carries several resistance genes, it is called multiresistant or, informally, a superbug. The term antimicrobial resistance is sometimes use to explicitly encompass organisms other than bacteria.
Antibiotic resistance can also be introduced artificially into a microorganism through transformation protocols. This can aid in implanting artificial genes into the microorganism. If the resistance gene is linked with the gene to be implanted, the antibiotic can be used to kill off organisms that lack the new gene.
Over use is related to was the poste above you said, if you are using antibiotics more than you should you are just allowing the resistant bacteria to become mroe previlent in a population, as bacteria when they multiple not only replication identically but can transfer plasmids (bacterial DNA) between baterical cells so a resistant baterica cell can pass a plasmid containing the gene for antibiotic resistant to a cell without thereby making it resistantdolbinau said:So specifically, I think the issue with incorrect/overuse is the more you do it, the more likely you will expose it to a population where members are resistant; they reproduce and the trait becomes more common.
When, without overuse/incorrect use these mutations would be quite uncommon in the population and the population does not 'evolve' as it isn't common. (And the little resistant members eventually die over time - the trait gone)
Is this correct? I understand the concept of Antibacterial resistance but specifically related to 'over or incorrect use' I'm not 100% sure about.
Also, I know that the question asks for antibiotics, but if it didnt you can talk about the overuse of antibacterial soaps and stuff.dolbinau said:Is this correct? I understand the concept of Antibacterial resistance but specifically related to 'over or incorrect use' I'm not 100% sure about.
I emphasise this simple answersyriangabsta said:natural selection.
Emphasise all you like, write "Natural Selection" in the exam to a question like this and see how many marks you get.Shadose said:I emphasise this simple answer
well of course you would, but in the end, the answer is natural selection.Shadose said:I emphasise this simple answer
Your answer was fine as it allowed the op to research the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection. The emphasise on the 'simple answer' creates a false sense that the whole process can be answered with two words. Nothing agaisnt a succinct and concise post as long as it doesn't completely detract as emphasising does.syriangabsta said:well of course you would, but in the end, the answer is natural selection.
what you're going to do is shove natural selection in there, give a defentiion then throw in examples and relate it to the question..
i wasnt answering the question, i was simply showing the basis of the answer
It depends on the number of marks allocatedWantToDoBetter said:Emphasise all you like, write "Natural Selection" in the exam to a question like this and see how many marks you get.
Better to give the OP a 3 or 4 mark answer than a 1 mark answer.Shadose said:It depends on the number of marks allocated
no. i dont write tooo big. i answer the q, thats what im supposed 2 do...Shadose said:hmm okay...
Do you usually need to ask for more paper?