+Po1ntDeXt3r+
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2003
- Messages
- 3,527
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2003
non-UNSW perspectiveSounds intriguing, really does.
May I put a few questions forward? My apologies for hijacking the tread.
1. Is there much lab work during the first year? For example viewing different specimens of skin disease (strange example, i know), do you use microscopes much?
2. Do you cover the history of medicine in great depth?
3. How much time is dedicated to hospital experience during the first year?
4. During the later years of your study is there anything you wish you paid more attention to, and were there times where you thought this is way too complex for me to comprehend, or too much for me to tolerate? What is it? And what would you do to better prepare for it?... can be a situation
1/ we had some not much... *rolls eyes..* gram negative bacilli! lol 3rd yr had dissection as an elective option..
2/ yes and no in various lectures usually.. best off reading NEJM there are history articles now and then
3/ 1-2 hrs a week.. minimal clinical interaction.. just for figuring out whos the sociopaths
4/ ummmm at my stage.. i think there is... i still have trouble with neurology... like the terminology/eponymous names... gets me.. e.g wernicke's vs brocas... is eqv to receptive vs expressive aphasias.. i cant remember which is which so i go WR.. BE lol it works.. i dun get confused even thought i know the symptoms, the clinical picture and the treatments... simple little things.. it takes the shine off ones performance
I find that its mostly about working to be a good diagnostician.. able to learn things lik suturing quickly after seeing it once or twice.. and answering correctly.. knowing both brand names and generics for meds... laymans and technical terms for diseases.. and above all knowing confidently how to reassure ur patient to the correct standards..."oh it just a malignancy you will be great..."- oh no they wont
explaining the risk of progress to prostate cancer/death if the PSA is less than 10 or 5 or 1..
personally I now realise the level that your patients are the final judge of your management ... the statistics are guides and even if the p value < 0.05.. inevitablely one of your patients will always fall in that 5% group.. and suffer from something different
P.S.. KT is the super awesome queen of the trolls.. and we so love her