I still don't get the point of posting that.
It doesn't even mention the word "tax" in that article you newb. You haven't pointed out anything.Just wanted to point out that not everyone assumes that profit is 'after-tax' like you say?!
What do you think that net profit is then?? The article talks about profit, cash-profit and net-profit (after tax) so how can you say profit is 'always' after tax?It doesn't even mention the word "tax" in that article you newb. You haven't pointed out anything.
God you are stupid :|Yes - but that is earnings..... earnings / net income are not necessarily the same as profits!?!?
Maybe you should do ACCT1501?!
Surely the fact that we are both able to provide examples shows that you were wrong to make that assumption? 'Always' is a strong word.....
You?Yes - but the SMH article reports Profit in the headline, and Net Profit in the story (Net Profit is profit AFTER tax - see the definition in Wikipedia if you don't believe me). So that must mean that the profit in the headline is BEFORE tax.
Now who's stupid?
No point in arguing with person....You?
Maybe you didn't read the SMH article - the profit in title/headline is $2.83bn, the net-profit referred to in article is $2.05bn. Some difference, and not rounding down.....The reason why they don't say "Net Profit" in the title is just basic english. It doesn't make the headline sound good. It is too much of a mouthful and it is not short, snappy and attention grabbing.
Nah, I am right. Even 'mash121' agrees with me.Maybe fortune cookie will accept he / she is wrong?!?
Shouldn't hold breath waiting....
He sympathizes with your issue but ultimately says your wrong and that you should have done your due diligence.Nah, I am right. Even 'mash121' agrees with me.
Delusional....Nah, I am right. Even 'mash121' agrees with me.
Since I now live in a democratic country, maybe I can put this to the vote. Who is stupid:You?