• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2015 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Wrong, you let u^15 = x

The rest can be easily done using the standard log and arctan integral forms.

EDIT: hmmmm... Wolfram Alpha says I'm wrong..... Where are the mistakes?
I can't see your pictures.
 

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
463
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

I tried using the substituion
x = u^(15/4)
Which will then lead to u^4/(1+u^3) requiring long division and then a fractional decomposition. But then it didnt give me an arctan?
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon



Not too sure what happened at the polynomial long division or partial fractions step. 1+u^3 is the sum of two cubes.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Evaluate

For a similar but easier problem, evaluate
 
Last edited:

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

I think they are both equal to .

For the sum one:



Typing integral one up now.
 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon



(Since the first term is just 2*arctan(R-1/2) and the second has size bounded by 2/(1+(R-1/2)^2), which tends to zero.)
 
Last edited:

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon



(In an exam you should of course write these improper integrals as the limit of integrals from -T to T, to justify things like splitting and recombining them, and the use of integration by parts. Some of the integrals as written in the above working don't actually exist as improper integrals over the full real line.)
Hm, interesting approach. I thought you would have split the arctangent directly as you did in the summation. Whatever runs through the mind faster I guess...
 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Hm, interesting approach. I thought you would have split the arctangent directly as you did in the summation. Whatever runs through the mind faster I guess...
Is it a consequential difference? Either way we get an arctan integral, which we perform by integrating by parts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top