• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2016 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon





(This question reminds me of the last question of the 2014 hsc, where doing IBP, via inspection can solve it in a couple of steps)
How did you guess the integral ?
 

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,615
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

How did you guess the integral ?
Inspection. :p
AKA Wolfram alpha...
I didn't use wolfram alpha to guess it, its something that comes with practice. As I said, it's similar to the last question of the 2014 HSC where you can guess it and solve the integral in a couple of steps.

Guessing a term and differentiating it to make it look like the given integral is my way of doing IBP, and hence the reason why I did it that way.
 
Last edited:

omegadot

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
230
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

I didn't use wolfram alpha to guess it, its something that comes with practice. As I said, it's similar to the last question of the 2014 HSC where you can guess it and solve the integral in a couple of steps.

Guessing a term and differentiating it to make it look like the given integral is my way of doing IBP, and hence the reason why I did it that way.








 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

I see InteGrand beat me to it.....
Well my method doesn't require those trig. identities like in your second method, but the idea is similar (cancel out one integral by using the integral from the IBP step).
 

omegadot

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
230
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Well my method doesn't require those trig. identities like in your second method, but the idea is similar (cancel out one integral by using the integral from the IBP step).
Yes, I agree, your method is definitely more elegant.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Not the easiest thing to observe. Obviously t-formulae are useful but best give a mention.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Alternatively, we can again do it by breaking up the integral and using IBP to cancel out some integrals and be left with the answer. This would require a tedious differentiation using the quotient rule, but avoids the need for non-well-known trig. identities.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Not the easiest thing to observe. Obviously t-formulae are useful but best give a mention.
Never used t-formulae. Reduced the fraction purely into the two fundamental ratios and applied double angle formulae.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Here's a question for new 2016'ers I just thought of:

 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Question skipped:
Here's a question for new 2016'ers I just thought of:

Though, if one does not know the derivative of cotangent inverse one may like to note that arccot(x) = arctan(1/x)
-----------------------------
sinx/(1+cosx) I would've felt happy using double angles. I don't feel too comfortable doing so when sec is hanging there even if it's really 1/cos
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top