MedVision ad

HSC Physics Marathon 2013-2015 Archive (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

el_manu

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
126
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive


Why is the answer C?
Is it because this a p-n junction?
Don't holes move in opposite direction to electrons?

Somone help please!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
71
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive


Why is the answer C?
Is it because this a p-n junction?
Don't holes move in opposite direction to electrons?

Somone help please!
This is my assumption.
To be carrying a current, it necessitates that electrons flow in opposite directions to the holes. From the right hand palm rule, the flow of holes- conventional current- would be downwards when subjected to the magnetic field. Similarly the electrons will also encounter a downward force (use your left hand) and thus, both would move to the same side of the rod (downwards).
 

keepLooking

Active Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
477
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

"Both the positive holes flowing in one direction and the electrons flowing in the other direction will experience a force to the same side of the rod, i.e. the bottom side." - Success One.
 

Zlatman

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2014
Messages
73
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive


Why is the answer C?
Is it because this a p-n junction?
Don't holes move in opposite direction to electrons?

Somone help please!
Use the right-hand palm rule for the holes, and left-hand (or reverse right-hand) palm rule for the electrons.

With the RHPR, point your thumb in the direction of the holes (conventional current) and fingers in the direction of the magnetic field. Your palm will be facing down, so the holes experience a force downwards.

With the LHPR, point your left thumb in the opposite direction to the holes (i.e. in the direction of the electrons) and fingers in the direction of the magnetic field. Again, your palm will be facing down, so the electrons experience a force downwards.

Thus, both the holes and the electrons move to the bottom of the rod.

(lol rekt, got beaten to it twice)
 

el_manu

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
126
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

It's a dumb question as "side" could literally mean anything.
The electrons are traveling towards us to the nearest side and holes to the far side. Yet, side the question is talking about is the up or down side. Fuckin dumb question.
 

Mr_Kap

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,127
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

this is bullshit and wrong. Using the reverse right hand rule the palm faces upwards, meaning electrons deflect up
 

atargainz

Active Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
289
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

this is bullshit and wrong. Using the reverse right hand rule the palm faces upwards, meaning electrons deflect up
This is what I was thinking, already switching to the left hand but in order to get it facing downwards, you would still need to reverse the current (direction of your thumb). I thought changing hands already did this? I could be missing something though
 

Mr_Kap

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,127
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

This is what I was thinking, already switching to the left hand but in order to get it facing downwards, you would still need to reverse the current (direction of your thumb). I thought changing hands already did this? I could be missing something though
yeh. If you use the left hand rule then you dont need to change current direction with your thumb. I think this is a faulty answer and the answer should be they move to opposite side
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
71
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

Uh, I think it's because electrons and holes travel in opposite directions the first place.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
71
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

The acceleration of the planet is greater than the deceleration of the planet when leaving. The answer is :
According to the planet there is no change in velocity while in the frame of reference of the sun the spaceship gained speed.
If youre on a planet and you see a spaceship use the slingshot effect there would be no change in speed from your perspective:)
I don't understand, why is there no change in speed from the perspective of the observer on the planet?
 

keepLooking

Active Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
477
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

I don't understand, why is there no change in speed from the perspective of the observer on the planet?
Principle of Conservation of Momentum. When the spaceship gains momentum, the planet will lose momentum hence there is no change of speed from the perspective of the observer on the planet.
 

spatula232

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
348
Location
Mars One
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

What's the purpose of the dry ice in a Wilson Cloud Chamber?
 

mrpotatoed

Active Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Messages
195
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

Principle of Conservation of Momentum. When the spaceship gains momentum, the planet will lose momentum hence there is no change of speed from the perspective of the observer on the planet.
The velocity change of the planet is negligible though, the velocity change of the spaceship is large
 

Crisium

Pew Pew
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
2,009
Location
Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

What's the purpose of the dry ice in a Wilson Cloud Chamber?
I don't do this option but is it something to do with the dry ice melting to the carbon dioxide gas form and radiation ionising these particles and then there's something about droplets forming a path (beta has a zig zag one iirc) --> tbh I have no idea LOL I came across it a few times in chem though
 

Mr_Kap

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,127
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

The velocity change of the planet is negligible though, the velocity change of the spaceship is large
m1v1 = m2v2

The large mass of the planet, compared to the small mass of the spaceship balance out and momntum is conserved
 

mrpotatoed

Active Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Messages
195
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

Momentum is the same but the relative velocity would different after the slingshot effect has occurred?
 

TQuadded

Breaking the limits.
Joined
Sep 11, 2014
Messages
342
Location
In a parallel universe.
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
re: HSC Physics Marathon Archive

Momentum is the same but the relative velocity would different after the slingshot effect has occurred?
Yes.

For example, if a planet is rotating at 100,000,000,000 km/h, then a spaceship takes advantage using Slingshot Effect and gains 1,000 km/h, that is a large increase of velocity for the spaceship, but barely any decrease for the planet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top