Well, because every time one of us UWSers makes a valid point, you try to state that that point is invalid or incorrect. It's gotten to a point where I think you just post crap to piss me off. You don't actually have any supporting material stating that Usyd or UNSW are better for networking do you? If you do, then I'd be happy to accept your argument. If you're just basing it on pure observation, then I would like to ask you politely to stop making pathetic counter arguments against the rest of us that actually do appreciate UWS.
If I've made "pathetic counter arguments" then why haven't you addressed them? You didn't even say anything in relation to my original post about the facilities and timetabling of your university. You should also notice that I included Sydney so I'm not saying UWS is the worst of the worst, it isn't and it would be plainly untrue to state that. It is a decent university that gets a bad wrap due to its student base. Mind you, a fuckload of UNSW students are retarded human beings but have just developed an ability to study like robots.
The reason why I mentioned that Sydney and UNSW are better for networking is that they generally have harder workers, evidenced by their higher postgrad enrollments, their better results in competitions, higher enrollments at more stringent levels of acceptance, higher levels of graduate employment and income at different universities and the pure fact that they actually have degrees that other universities don't. I can't do Software Engineering at UWS, so by virtue of that fact I can sufficiently conclude that UNSW is better in a lot of regards. Also, UNSW's Co-Op Program.
A lot of people when reading my posts itt seem to get confused with what I mean. When I say that
I think UNSW is better, that doesn't mean that UWS or Sydney are bad universities. They aren't lol but I do like to point out errors in people's reasoning.
((
