amdspotter
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2020
- Messages
- 126
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2022
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
I agree they are the same.i dont see any major difference between these two qs can someone explain / elaborate on whether there is any huge diff in the qs and how we would approach it cuz i feel like i would approach both qs in the same way:
View attachment 34525View attachment 34526
I do not understand the steps written with a question mark. Everything else is right.Additionally, you may wish to have a look at the following working for Question 5:
View attachment 34528
View attachment 34529
View attachment 34530
I hope this helps!![]()
I'm not jimmy, but can help you out here. Honestly, I would stick to what your school tells you to do. With me, I had asked my teacher (as well as other teachers) before exams, and they said it was fine to write a small conclusion, as in theory, it doesn't test your understanding of the topic (but some schools may assign a mark for completeness). So I could get away with a conclusion like "Thus, according to mathematical induction, 2^x - 1 will always be prime for all odd numbers x > 1" (just a hypothetical example).@jimmysmith560 Is it necessary to write the long final conclusion statement, especially when we are doing a test or can we suffice by just writing "as per mathematical induction the following statement is true for ...."
Ah ok that makes senseI agree they are the same.
The meaning are only slightly different.
As you can say the multiples of 3 are: 3, 6, 9, etc
But you cannot say divisible of 3.