MedVision ad

induction question - please help! (1 Viewer)

frangipani13

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
36
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
okay well usually im fairly good at induction but im having a lot of trouble with this...due in on tuesday to my teacher. its from the 1999 hsc paper:

Prove by induction that for all integers >= 1:
(n+1)(n+2)...(2n-1)2n = 2^n [1x2x...x(2n-1)]

its the ... on both sides thats confusing me. its true for n=1 but im stuck on proving it for n=k+1

(k+2)(k+3)...(2k+1)(2k+2) = 2^(k+1) [1x2x...x(2k)]

thanks...any help is much appreciated!
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
Let n=1
S1 = 1 = 1
S1 is true

Assume n=k
.: (k+1)(k+2)...(2k-1)2k = 2k[1x2x...x(2k-1)]

Let n=k+1
.: (k+1)(k+2)...(2k-1)2k x (2k+2)(2k+1) = 2k[1x2x...x(2k-1)] x (2k+2)(2k+1)
= 2k[1x2x...x(2k-1)] x (2k+2)(2k+1)
=

Well this is all I can get up to :( If I can do more I'll post it up :)
 

richz

Active Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,348
hi frangipani13,

ok

Assume n=k
.: (k+1)(k+2)...(2k-1)2k = 2k[1x2x...x(2k-1)]

Prove true for n=k+1
(k+2)(k+3)....(2k-2)(2k-1)2k.2k(2k+1)(2k+2)= 2k+1[1x2x...x(2k+1)]

the term in bold can be simplified, 2k+2=2(k+1)

LHS=2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)....(2k-1)2k.2k(2k+1)

= 2.2k[1x2x...x(2k-1)]2k(2k+1)

ok now, divide both sides by 2k+1

u see now
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MAICHI

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
146
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I don't know, I got to an expression which is 2n+1 short, there is something wrong with the question. If you do some algebra you can get this expression from the original question: 2n = (2^n)*n!, which clearly is not possible except for n=1.
 

klaw

Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2005
Messages
683
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
No, her teacher copied the HSC Q wrong
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Why did you guys multiply by 2 terms instead of 1
i.e (2k+1)(2k+2)
shouldn't it just be multiplied by (2k+2) since you multiply by the k'th term i.e:
2(k+1)=2k+2
If i am right then check this out:
Assume true for n=k
i.e (k+1)(k+2)(k+3)...(2k-1)2k=2k[1x2x3x...x(2k-1)]
Prove for n=k+1
i.e (k+2)(k+3)(k+4)...(2k-1)2k(2k+2)=2k+1[1x2x3x...x(2k+1)]
LHS=(k+2)(k+3)(k+4)...(2k-1)2k(2k+2)
=2[(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)...(2k-1)2k]
=2k[1x2x3x...x(2k-1)][2(2k+1)] by the assumption
=2k+1[1x2x3x...x(2k-1)](2k+1)
=RHS! :):p
 

frangipani13

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
36
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
no my teacher photocopied a page from the success one book on induction q's...the marker's comments i read said the vast majority of hsc students couldn't do it properly because it involved production rather than addiction. (unfortunately didnt have the solution) im sure the question's right.
 

richz

Active Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,348
well, call the maths book to fuck a duck, check out the website, it even says 3.
 

klaw

Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2005
Messages
683
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Riviet said:
Why did you guys multiply by 2 terms instead of 1
i.e (2k+1)(2k+2)
shouldn't it just be multiplied by (2k+2) since you multiply by the k'th term i.e:
2(k+1)=2k+2
If i am right then check this out:
Assume true for n=k
i.e (k+1)(k+2)(k+3)...(2k-1)2k=2k[1x2x3x...x(2k-1)]
Prove for n=k+1
i.e (k+2)(k+3)(k+4)...(2k-1)2k(2k+2)=2k+1[1x2x3x...x(2k+1)]
LHS=(k+2)(k+3)(k+4)...(2k-1)2k(2k+2)
=2[(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)...(2k-1)2k]
=2k[1x2x3x...x(2k-1)][2(2k+1)] by the assumption
=2k+1[1x2x3x...x(2k-1)](2k+1)
=RHS! :):p
No. 2n+1 is an AP, where the common difference is 2. Therefore the number increases by 2 every time. Therefore 1*2*3*... does not fit in the series. You can see it's wrong just from the Q.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Oo i see, yeah you're right it goes up by one at the start and ends up going by 2 lol. :uhhuh:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top