• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Integral question (1 Viewer)

Joined
Oct 22, 2023
Messages
79
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
can someone check if my working is correct i got this integral from spivak's calculus









also are there any alternative methods than this substitution?
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I've checked. Seems to be correct. Congratulations.
I would not expect you to have Michael Spivak's textbook.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2023
Messages
79
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
yea my tutor gave me the textbook cause he thought i would have liked some of the questions. at first i tried using a trig substitution but i couldnt get anywhere with that so i was just wondering if there was another solution.
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
yea my tutor gave me the textbook cause he thought i would have liked some of the questions. at first i tried using a trig substitution but i couldnt get anywhere with that so i was just wondering if there was another solution.
You've done very well to do the integration with the suggested substitution. I tried x^2 = tan@ - fruitless.
 

tywebb

dangerman
Joined
Dec 7, 2003
Messages
2,166
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
The one I put there is Michael Spivak's own solution.

It comes from the Combined Answer Book For Calculus Third and Fourth Editions - Chapter 19 Q8v.

The Calculus book and Combined Answer Book are both available as ebooks.
 
Last edited:

tywebb

dangerman
Joined
Dec 7, 2003
Messages
2,166
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
One can improve upon Spivak's solution by combining the 2 substitutions:



Hence

 

imagineee

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2024
Messages
34
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Yep that's the way I would've done it, although the trig sub is kind of unnecessary since you can change I to 1/u^2(1-2/u^2)^1/2 then it's essentially reverse chain-ruleable into a standard arcsine/arccos integral
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top