1. What qualities do u need to do well (or cope with) in LAW.
The popular belief is that uni courses are divided into Science or Humanities ("numbers" and "words"). I would say law is both. You don't need to be good in English, as in the high school type of English, to do it. As long as you can understand English, you'll do fine (I did 2 Unit General Eng back in school).
Law is about logic and reasoning. If you're the type of person who constantly questions things, and wants to know what makes things tick, and likes to apply their knowledge to real world problems, then Law's suitable.
2.What's the main subject that Law relies on from high school..english , legal studies..debating.???
You don't need to be a good speaker to do law. The only requirement for law is a logical, applied mindset. That's why you get people doing Arts/Law, Science/Law, Commerce/Law, Engineering/Law, the whole gammut.
3. What are the main form of assessments in Law?...essays?..presentations.?..
The primary forms of assessment, apart from exams are problem essays and research essays. There will be the occasional presentation. Group work crops up from time to time. I think you only have to do a case note once, in Foundations of Law.
4. Also does the uni u graduate from make that much of a difference? Since sydney and unsw seem quite difficult to get into.
The UAI of the course reflects demand. Usyd and UNSW are the most highly regarded in this state. I would prefer UNSW due to the classroom-mode of teaching, which is so much better than large lecture halls.
Asquithian: Contracts has hardly any debate (like for say, Torts). It's pretty much a black-letter subject - this is the law, this is how you apply it, here's a problem, what do you think? Most of the classroom discussion seems to be "what did this judge say about this issue? what was his/her reasoning?"