Slidey
But pieces of what?
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2004
- Messages
- 6,600
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2005
Just because you're arrogant enough to agree with wendus' argument doesn't make it valid kiddo.cannibal.horse said:Wtf is it that everytime someone says anything remotely non-egalitarian they have to get slammed into, despite the validity of their arguement?
Quit your bullshitting. You're just trying to defend a stupid claim by pulling out the generic "political correctness" line. Pro tip: that only works if the shit you are pushing is the ugly truth. Your shit, well, it's just uninformed elitist garbage - truth wouldn't touch it with a 10' pole.- You can't criticise another religion, despite its theological flaws without being accused of 'theological imperialism'
Show me an average Australian who calls criticism of religion "theological imperialism" and I'll punch them in the face. I don't fancy I'll be arrested for battery any time soon.
What frustrates me is Asian kids and their silly unfounded preconceptions of intelligence and prestige. This isn't class-based China any more honey; you can give up your superiority act.- I recently saw a member of this forum get accused of racism as he claimed to dislike international students because it frustrated him that he was forced to work with them for group assignments despite the fact they could barely speak or write english (a rather valid arguement)
As I tried to point out to you earlier (but I get it - you don't want to listen), trades and such comprise only about half of TAFE students. You've then got a bunch of things like nursing, business, art, digital media and IT, which I reckon you'd certainly be hard-pressed to claim are 'subjects for the dim-witted proles'.- Here a handful of people are getting criticised for badmouthing Tafe as 'dumb' - yes people go to tafe for alternate reasons but as I argued earlier the majority of people doing brick laying/plumbing would be doing so because academia is not where their talent lies (which primarily is an indicator of intelligence).
Secondly, you have no clue what you're talking about re intelligence. To start with, academia implies intelligence but intelligence doesn't imply academia. Nice use of the denying the antecedent there mate. Why don't you take a few courses in psychology or at least statistical inference or something before you open your mouth about sociological issues; heaven knows the last thing we need is another pretentious little upstart claiming to know the intricacies of societal dynamics.
Forgive me if I don't fall for argumentum ad verecundiam.Edit: Plus Wendus goes to North Sydney Girls, she's quite obviously intelligent.
Last edited: