Is western civilisation better than aboriginies of the past? (3 Viewers)

[ongitsanjali]

being raped is not a part of a culture. it's a crime statistic.

i was talking about culture as in art, music, et. etc.

and all the rape, murder, and all that shit is only the result of their being fucked up after the british came in..

 

[Riet]

thats why most aboriginals in the NT don't know it's illegal right?

 

[HalcyonSky]

btw cxlxoxk are u an abo?

 

[cxlxoxk]

No, i'm Australian - born here, parents are Asian.

 

[ongitsanjali]

thats why most aboriginals in the NT don't know it's illegal right?

did you not read what i wrote?

"and all the rape, murder, and all that shit is only the result of their being fucked up after the british came in.."

 

[Riet]

Lol, yeh sure.

 

[HalcyonSky]

did you not read what i wrote?

"and all the rape, murder, and all that shit is only the result of their being fucked up after the british came in.."

you're really out of touch with reality, hey?
http://community.boredofstudies.org/

 

[jb_nc]

did you not read what i wrote?

"and all the rape, murder, and all that shit is only the result of their being fucked up after the british came in.."

Correlation does not equal causation, motherfucker.

Prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the British colonisation of Australia was the sole cause for Abos problems.

 

[cxlxoxk]

no, she isn't...

british gave abos drugs and poisoned flour when they arrived, and when they had cars that needed petrol, they simulataneously brought to aborigines some petrol to abuse...

if british never came = no drugs/alcohol and no petrol abuse.

 

[ongitsanjali]

you're really out of touch with reality, hey?
http://community.boredofstudies.org/

nope that would actually be YOU


and jb_nc i would go to that link posted above... pretty much says it all

why are you all in such denial? geeeeez accept it, and move on for god's sakes

 

[cxlxoxk]

well being a relativist would be better than being a bigot.

 

[jb_nc]

and jb_nc i would go to that link posted above... pretty much says it all

No, it doesn't.

 

[jb_nc]

Bigot

Cultural Relativist

PICK ONE OR UR DEAD

 

[cxlxoxk]

HOLY SHIT

it's a FALSE DICHOTOMY!

HAHAHAAHAHA

who farking cares about "false dichotomy".

 

[ongitsanjali]

No, it doesn't.

how doesn't it??

mate, the british introduced the aborigines to large scale violence, stole their lands, raped their women, separated them from their children, killed half of them off with diseases they had no immunity to, and tried to assimilate them into supposedly "superior" western culture while ostracising them at the same time.

granted, the aborigines weren't perfect either, they also did a bit in retaliation and they're screwing themselvesup now too. BUT it was all catalysed by the arrival of the british and their rough treatment of them and though that rough treatment may have stopped by now, abos are still feeling the after effects of it all.

^not sure if all that made sense but u get what i mean

 

[jb_nc]

how doesn't it??

mate, the british introduced the aborigines to large scale violence, stole their lands, raped their women, separated them from their children, killed half of them off with diseases they had no immunity to, and tried to assimilate them into supposedly "superior" western culture while ostracising them at the same time.

granted, the aborigines weren't perfect either, they also did a bit in retaliation and they're screwing themselvesup now too. BUT it was all catalysed by the arrival of the british and their rough treatment of them and though that rough treatment may have stopped by now, abos are still feeling the after effects of it all.

^not sure if all that made sense but u get what i mean

^{[Citation needed]}

That's right, the British introduced every single Aboriginal to "large-scale violence". There had been no wars over land or anything else before the British colonialists arrived.

Just how stupid do you think Indigenous Australians are?

 

[cxlxoxk]

^{Citation needed}

no citation needed...it's all blatantly obvious/fact.

Aborigines were nomadic, they don't all live together... thus there was no true "large scale violence" at least not as large scale as when the british came.

 

[jb_nc]

no citation needed...it's all blatantly obvious/fact.

^{[Citation needed]}

 

[ongitsanjali]

i learnt it in class

pretty sure the bos doesn't feed us with mythology in the school cert course, but if u insist see that jackaranda book on australian history.

 

[jb_nc]

no citation needed...it's all blatantly obvious/fact.

Aborigines were nomadic, they don't all live together... thus there was no true "large scale violence" at least not as large scale as when the british came.

Then if they were 'nomadic', how could their lands be stolen? Because a nomad has no fixed location for living.