Wheelbarrows
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 117
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2008
HEART!Nebuchanezzar said:This discussion is thankfully become serious! BoS anti-Israel league unite!
Water!
HEART!Nebuchanezzar said:This discussion is thankfully become serious! BoS anti-Israel league unite!
Water!
Jews have the right to occupy Palestine and kick arabs outta their lands because it is given to them by God. Jewish settlement of Israel predates arabs migration and settlement of the area by at least 2000 years.Nebuchanezzar said:Yes I can picture it now.
UN: Ok Arabs. You've been living here for centuries. Jews want to live here now. Please divide your territory into two so the Jews can occupy one half.
Arabs: ...
A two State Solution was rejected by Arabs and instead they decided to kill all jews, they tried 3 times and failed. Israel gained more lands with each war and it has every right to keep the lands seized during the war, those lands were paid for by the bloods of brave Israeli soldiers and they shall never be returned to arabs. Eternal war and violence is more preferable than returning lands to arabs who can go back to Arabia where they belong!Destruction? No. But I do support the eradication, I suppose, of Israel. Long term. See, thing is, trolling aside I'm generally not someone who likes war or violence or whatever, and would prefer to see almost anything in place of violence. If you refuse to acknowledge a country for very good reasons (which have not as of yet been confronted on this forum, and some pro-Israeli members have been so kind as to admit that I'm quite right), then it would be somewhat odd to say that you support its permanent foundation in the land it is occupying. I would like to see Israel gone from the Mid-East and returned to its rightful owners. This will take time. For the time being, a two-state solution is the only way to go.
Agreed.Iron said:I was thinking past "1880 or so" and to, you know, Moses.
It's not as though the Jews woke up one day and said "Oy! There's some good shtick to be made elsewhere I thinks! We could be very comfortable I knows!". There were centuries of genocide and forced removal, from Babylonians to crusaders to Muslims. Throughout it all they forged perhaps the strongest, most enduring culture the world has seen and it has always revolved around this strip of promised land. When it comes to this story, Islam is the new kid on the block, not the rightful owner.
Both East and West have had a hand in Jewish persecution. We owe them their homeland where they can rule themselves and live in dignity, without the fear of our historical persecution. But it hasnt been a gift. They've fought for a state for hundreds of years. Now that they have it, they've been constantly defending it for the last 60. Why do you think they dont roll over? Why didnt they bail like Americans or other Western powers? They have a link to this land that is so strong that they have been willing to die for it for something like 3 and a half thousand years. It is an enduring, inextinguishable link and you need to shut up and get over it.
Frankly, I believe that the problem is essentially Islam. It's up to you guys to haul yoursleves out of the middle-ages and make a serious commitment to the dignity of human life.
Once again, I see through your trolling but I'll bite anyway. Arabs have always lived there yes? Jews have periodically lived there yes? Arabs were the owners of the land before Jews colonised it recently yes? I think there's quite a case to be made for the Arabs.Iron said:I was thinking past "1880 or so" and to, you know, Moses.
It's not as though the Jews woke up one day and said "Oy! There's some good shtick to be made elsewhere I thinks! We could be very comfortable I knows!". There were centuries of genocide and forced removal, from Babylonians to crusaders to Muslims. Throughout it all they forged perhaps the strongest, most enduring culture the world has seen and it has always revolved around this strip of promised land. When it comes to this story, Islam is the new kid on the block, not the rightful owner.
This paragraph is rooted in the idea that the Jewish link to Palestine is stronger than the Arab link. I doubt this. I have made my reasoning clear.Both East and West have had a hand in Jewish persecution. We owe them their homeland where they can rule themselves and live in dignity, without the fear of our historical persecution. But it hasnt been a gift. They've fought for a state for hundreds of years. Now that they have it, they've been constantly defending it for the last 60. Why do you think they dont roll over? Why didnt they bail like Americans or other Western powers? They have a link to this land that is so strong that they have been willing to die for it for something like 3 and a half thousand years. It is an enduring, inextinguishable link and you need to shut up and get over it
Aryanbeauty said:Jews have the right to occupy Palestine and kick arabs outta their lands because it is given to them by God. Jewish settlement of Israel predates arabs migration and settlement of the area by at least 2000 years.
So we should kick all non-Native Americans out of America and all non-Aboriginals out of Australia?
An interesting theory, dropkick.
But native Americans should be able to kick all non native Americans out and all non aboriginals from Australia.samdmkidd said:So we should kick all non-Native Americans out of America and all non-Aboriginals out of Australia?
An interesting theory, dropkick.
The first one plz.Iron said:I find this line of questioning to be a nervous distraction. Are you still maintaining that the land is and always was "Arab", or are you going to offer a definition of why "Arab" ownership over the land crystalized before 1948 into a claim that cannot be disputed by anyone?
This is besides the point that we already agree on: Palestine deserves statehood. You've been oddly reluctant to admit that Israel has a right to exist, but you seem to admit that it's continued existance is a practical reality