• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Last minute LAT study (1 Viewer)

HazzRat

H̊ͯaͤz͠z̬̼iẻͩ̊͏̖͈̪
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
1,248
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
How r u guys preparing for that lat? I reckon I’m gonna look at the Oj Simpson defence to learn some ‘legalese’ and then do some practise responses.
 

HazzRat

H̊ͯaͤz͠z̬̼iẻͩ̊͏̖͈̪
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
1,248
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
for the past hour i've been reading up on my philosophy: plato.stanford.edu

I'm gonna see if I can squeeze plato's allegory of the cave into one of my arguments.
 

HazzRat

H̊ͯaͤz͠z̬̼iẻͩ̊͏̖͈̪
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
1,248
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
Suppose that you have been invited to attend an ex-partner’s wedding and that the best thing you can do is accept the invitation and be pleasant at the wedding. But, suppose furthermore that if you do accept the invitation, you’ll freely decide to get inebriated at the wedding and ruin it for everyone, which would be the worst outcome. The second best thing to do would be to simply decline the invitation. In light of these facts, should you accept or decline the invitation? (Zimmerman 2006: 153). The answer to this question hinges on the actualism/possibilism debate in ethics, which concerns the relationship between an agent’s free actions and her moral obligations. In particular, it focuses on whether facts about how an agent would freely act in certain contexts play any role in determining the agent’s moral obligations. Historically, the debate has primarily arisen in the work of impartial consequentialists with an interest in deontic logic. However, its relevance is not limited to such versions of consequentialism. The debate concerns the scope of acts that are relevant options for the agent, which is an issue that cuts across, and has substantive implications for, a wide range of normative ethical views. As such, the debate brings into focus issues of central importance for any normative ethical theory.
🔥🔥🔥
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2024
Messages
13
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
How r u guys preparing for that lat? I reckon I’m gonna look at the Oj Simpson defence to learn some ‘legalese’ and then do some practise responses.
‘hey do you have the Lat at 3:15 tmr? I feel like I’m going crazy bc it’s in the afternoon
 

JosephSeed

Active Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Messages
153
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
Is there like some sort of response or something so i know what i should be writing towards

Like am i supposed to support my answers with techniques or evidence
 

JosephSeed

Active Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Messages
153
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
You should do fine :) I heard all you need is like a minimum of 60%. Like the average in prev years was 70%
not really, it just boosts your final mark, which is made up of your atar and adjustment facter and the LAT. i had a mates who got 50 and 30 but got atars of 97 and 92(this guy lived in a low socioeconomic area). that being said, im not getting in coz my atar is cooked😭
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top