MedVision ad

leehuan's All-Levels-Of-Maths SOS thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
MX2 problem. Required - c and d but all parts are given

 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
I will admit this is just a bit of confusion in my head and laziness to sort it out.

 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Only the case for (-1,0) but the whole question is again given (with a previous part)

 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Only the case for (-1,0) but the whole question is again given (with a previous part)



This is probably the identity in question required to prove that statement given the nature of the question.
 
Last edited:

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
The most straightforward way, however, would be to re-write the polynomial as a sum of perfect squares with zeroes that occur at different x-values.



as none of the terms all simultaneously share the same zero point over the reals, it is impossible for this expression to ever be zero, and hence it is strictly positive over the reals.
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Alternatively alternatively:

P(x)=(x^5-1)/(x-1) for x =/= 1.

But x^5 is increasing, so the numerator has the same sign as the denominator and P(x) > 0 apart from possibly at x=1.

(And P(1)=5 so we are positive here too.)

Edit: Haha, Integrand beat me to it.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Lol thanks everyone. I ended up doing this:

Let x=-b, 0<b<1
RTP:1-b+b^2-b^3+b^4

1>b implies 1-b>0
b>0 allows multiplying by b^3: b^4-b^3>0
b>0 also implies b^2>0
Sum them up.
________________

Getting confused with what I learnt. Someone please break down surjective functions for me, and injective just means one-to-one both x and y (therefore inverse function exists for the maximum domain) right?
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Lol thanks everyone. I ended up doing this:

Let x=-b, 0<b<1
RTP:1-b+b^2-b^3+b^4

1>b implies 1-b>0
b>0 allows multiplying by b^3: b^4-b^3>0
b>0 also implies b^2>0
Sum them up.
________________

Getting confused with what I learnt. Someone please break down surjective functions for me, and injective just means one-to-one both x and y (therefore inverse function exists for the maximum domain) right?
When you specify a function f: X->Y you are also specifying the domain X and the co-domain Y.

With this in mind:

f is said to be injective if any two distinct elements of X get sent to distinct elements of Y by f.

f is said to be surjective if for every y in the codomain Y there exists an x in X with f(x)=y. Ie f "hits everything" in the codomain.

f is said to be bijective if it is both injective and surjective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top