robo-andie
Member
Now can you find a country which has gained something from diversity?
Rome fell before the catholics gained any real power.katie_tully said:The downfall of rome was not due to "diversity". It was due to the Church and the fact that anything the Church touched turned to crap.
No, that's not what I meant.bshoc said:If by that you mean burned out cars, rioting islamic youths, homos etc. .. then no, its been a loss for anybody with a drop of sanity. Certainly limited diversity based on compatability has led to gains, for example Italians or any other European migrants, but thats mainly becuase European cultures are compatible and intechangable.
Is this the only benefit you can think of? A cheap workforce and 'more resturants' ?I was more thinking about how Australia managed to gain some ground once it abolished the white australia policy and became more diverse.
You mean... illegal immigrants that get paid close to nothing, and now can't recieve healthcare (no proof of citizenship) until they are basically on the verge of death? Oh Awsm.Or how a significant portion of the American workforce depends on immigrants.
Not really.The growth of Germany as a culturally rich and diverse country prior to Hitler and his Nazi party.
I could do without Eurovision kthx.The benefits global diversity has had for sport and music. The Olympics is an example of how diversity has benefited sport. Eurovision (however tacky it may be) is an example of diversity in music.
There is the sharing of information on a global scale, political alliances between countries as a result of each other embracing the others cultures, the opportunity for individuals to experience cultures different to their own within their own country, an increase in tolerance and a general social awareness of how other people live.Not-That-Bright said:Is this the only benefit you can think of? A cheap workforce and 'more resturants' ?
I was refering to the legal immigrants.You mean... illegal immigrants that get paid close to nothing, and now can't recieve healthcare (no proof of citizenship) until they are basically on the verge of death? Oh Awsm.
Yes really. A large portion of Berlins population were people from surrounding european countries. Homosexuality was embraced, differing cultural practices were embraced and the city thrived for a fair amount of time. Then Hitler came in and started shutting all the bars down and any place which promoted or accepted anything he didn't believe in. Once this begun happening, a lot of people left.Not really.
You might not enjoy it, but that doesn't mean other people don't. It is something which many European countries enjoy, I don't think many of them take it seriously.I could do without Eurovision kthx.
Sweden!robo-andie said:Now can you find a country which has gained something from diversity?
What kind of racism is this? Fancy being some poor African refugee fleeing a war torn country full of starvation and rape, and being told upon arrival in your new home that "diversification is a two way street". You disgust me.Rainbow Joanna said:Well the reality with diversification is a two way street if it is to be successful.
You obviously haven't studied The racist, religionist nature of contemporary Australian society, because if you had you'd know that it's not just the "clowns," but the majority of ordinary Australians who are fundamentally racist and fundamentally hate those of other religions. You should realise that by blaming the 'bunch of clowns' (eg. extremists) you're letting off the average person who is actually just as much to blame for religion and racial hatred as the extremists themselves. Don't be fooled, the average Australian genuinely hates anyone who is not of British descent and Christian, and discrimination and hatred of other types of people is a widespread plague in this country that affects EVERYONE. The majority are constantly using their privileged position to oppress and vilify minorities to lower their standards of living and exploit them.Rainbow Joanna said:But, seriously it is not going to be perfect as the theory suggests. The short answer is to do with the old mighty dollar and right wing conservative Christians or radical extremists of any religion in general.Without causing too much tension. You are always going to have a bunch of clowns who take religion and race that extra step too far.
This is geographyism at its worst. People from the North Shore are on average far more tolerant, diverse, and gay/lesbian/bi/trans than the rest of the country. This this makes them at least less repulsive than the average Australian as described in my 2nd paragraph. Your assumptions and generalisations about their wealth and "bourgeoisie" status are offensive. Being rich does not make them bad at all, if anything racism and hatred of 'the other' is more omnipresent in 'aspirational' Australians than the cultured individuals on the North Shore. I thought an intelligent progressive would understand why Geographyism is wrong. I suggest studying The classist, geographyist nature of contemporary Australian society.Rainbow Joanna said:As for North Shore people, it is just called retaining the Status Quo is much easier than giving out open arms, to change and new ideas (to many it is entering the unknown) as the general consensus in a lot of the more bourgeoisie areas it is the fear of being dragged outta their comfort zone. Why? Because the rich have everything to lose and nothing to gain.
Canada!Captain Gh3y said:
Money CANT buy u happiness, mate!-not in the long termAnti-Mathmite said:Which is why they are rich, and you shall never be