davidbarnes
Trainee Mȯderatȯr
I'm not a member of any political party so don't lie and say I am please.david is a member of the socialist alliance, so obviously he is an economic heavyweight
I'm not a member of any political party so don't lie and say I am please.david is a member of the socialist alliance, so obviously he is an economic heavyweight
You are stupidLabor saved us from the worst of the 2008-2010 Economic recession.
Liberals do give more employment freedom to employers, although this is bad for all employees.
except the ones who can't get a job because businesses are forced to pay too much and can't risk "unfair" dismissal of shit workersLabor saved us from the worst of the 2008-2010 Economic recession.
Liberals do give more employment freedom to employers, although this is bad for all employees.
No. Absolutely not. Show me a country though that can function where there is 90% unemployment? It would never happen.so by extension of your own logic having 90% unemployment where the 10% employed have a minimum wage of $1000/hr and 30 weeks paid leave is JUST FINE
this is utter rubbish and you know itLabor saved us from the worst of the 2008-2010 Economic recession.
I'm still waiting for you to explain why labor are better than the liberals at economic management.For a start, Labor repealled WorkChoices and gave fairer working conditions back to the Australian people.
No, China saved us.Labor saved us from the worst of the 2008-2010 Economic recession.
You're an idiot.It took the Liberals 11 years to come up with WorkChoices and it was easily one of the worst polciies from any side of government in the past 50 years of Australian politics. the Liberal were once strong on the economy, they lost that a long tiem ago though, labor is now better on the economy than the Liberals are.
Lol.For a start, Labor repealled WorkChoices and gave fairer working conditions back to the Australian people.
You just disagreed with your own logic.No. Absolutely not. Show me a country though that can function where there is 90% unemployment? It would never happen.
Yes it is, but that wasn't the reasoning I was criticising.Acquiring massive surpluses instead of either spending it or giving it back in tax cuts is still just as bad.
I think I will simply ignore you from now on if all you want to do is resort to childish name calling and cannot be civilized.I don't think he has a logic.. he just basically posts what comes into his head regardless of whether it's correct or not.
That was actually one of the few good things about it.The only bad thing about Workchoices was that it was an increase in federal powers.