Seconded: the motion is passed.Rafy said:Australian Defence Force Abolition Bill 2008.
Go.
Sukhois are really quite good, it's just completely illogical for us to use them. I've never heard complaints about us not using Kalashnikovs even though they are in some respects better than our current guns.Kwayera said:Yeah.
We should grab some Sukhois instead.
Photon Cannons.Enteebee said:I remember Nelson once saying that 95% of the capabilities of the JSF are in the public arena, but that there's 5% which is classified that makes it so important... Anyone have any suggestions as to what that '5%' may be?
Avionics, weapons system, radar systems etc. You need to consider that a HUGE part of a modern aircraft is the computer systems that fly it. I think the F-22 is better, hell I think everyone does, but there is no way in fuck they're going to sell them.Enteebee said:I remember Nelson once saying that 95% of the capabilities of the JSF are in the public arena, but that there's 5% which is classified that makes it so important... Anyone have any suggestions as to what that '5%' may be?
But of course in the modern defence arena it is not always necessary to have a lot of jets flying around. Maybe for the pilots such as yourself, more job opportunities I suppose...JSchaefer said:plus for the cost of one f22, i think it was 6 F35 JSF's we could buy...
yes, i still think the f22 would be better, it is after all the best tactical fighter in the world by farASNSWR127 said:But of course in the modern defence arena it is not always necessary to have a lot of jets flying around. Maybe for the pilots such as yourself, more job opportunities I suppose...
I think maybe the Eurofighter is a good option, the problem is the lack of stealth capability but I am sure in our region that isn't so important. After all it is only supposed to be a DEFENCE force isnt it?
true that, you can take away the pilot, the computers on the non manned aircraft in the future may fly faster, hold more G's, and for longer periods of time, but the computer will NEVER match the instincts and reflexes of a pilot.ASNSWR127 said:Yes fair point but I was under the impression the yanks weren't going to sell us their baby? Its because of the iminent threat of war between the US and Aus I think (man the Americans are screwed!)
I am still inclined to go Eurofighter for our context (provided there are no more EXTREMELY dubious wars in conjunction with the US anytime soon).
Plus I mean from an aviation point of view I would probably think the eurofightere would be little more 'real' to fly than the F-22's, less computer control etc.
Cheers
JSchaefer said:true that, you can take away the pilot, the computers on the non manned aircraft in the future may fly faster, hold more G's, and for longer periods of time, but the computer will NEVER match the instincts and reflexes of a pilot.
Thanks heaps man...have u ever thought of the ADF, ADFA? DE?ASNSWR127 said:the most sophisticated computer you can put into an aircraft is the human brain. Good luck to you in your flying. I used to take flying lessons (working at a supermarket to pay for it LAME!!) then it got just that too much expensive.
No yet, but I don't think it's a permanent thing.ASNSWR127 said:Yes fair point but I was under the impression the yanks weren't going to sell us their baby?
I am going to be Nursing Officer with the ADF actually.JSchaefer said:Thanks heaps man...have u ever thought of the ADF, ADFA? DE?
Well I think it would be interesting if the budget could handle it...Admiral Nelson said:No yet, but I don't think it's a permanent thing.