• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

MATH QUESTION HELP (1 Viewer)

frankfurt

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Messages
18
Gender
Female
HSC
2020
Hi guys,

I’m doing ecmt3160 this semester and I’m getting stuck on this question.
1654953265393.png
Could someone please help?
Thanks in advance:)
 

cossine

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Messages
626
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Hi guys,

I’m doing ecmt3160 this semester and I’m getting stuck on this question.
View attachment 35794
Could someone please help?
Thanks in advance:)
You have not written a question.

What are your definition, axiom, theorems?
Are you referring to any textbook? If so have you tried using Quizlet in conjunction to a disposable email. temp mail etc
 

frankfurt

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Messages
18
Gender
Female
HSC
2020
Oh sorry, I forgot to include the question into the screenshot.

The question is to show the following for any continuous random variable X.

Screen Shot 2022-06-12 at 12.21.14 pm.png
 

cossine

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Messages
626
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
P(X>x) is just some number between 0, 1

integral_from_0_to_infinity P(X>x) - P(X<-x) dx

If X belongs to a pdf where the domain is the positive set of real numbers this will mean and x>0

P(X>x) > 0, P(X<-x) = 0.

P(X>x) = 1 - cdf(x)

Maybe this could help give you an idea. Maybe next split the integral and then use integration by parts. Of course you will need to generalise your proof for the set of real numbers
 

cossine

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Messages
626
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Hi, thanks Cossine- your hint helped me figure it out

I had another question that I'm struggling with:

View attachment 35809
If you can please try to use (12):
View attachment 35810


Thanks in advance! :)
I think I understood the content.

The text seems a little bit off with the wording. Instead of saying joint distribution function for definition 11 they should say joint cumulative distribution function.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function

So what they really want if we going by there precise wording is actually the probability mass function of X and Y. Not the cumulative probability mass function. So I am not to sure how to use 12.**

So construct 6 by 6 matrix with X on the y-axis, Y on the x-axis. This matrix is an upper diagonal matrix by definition since X <= Y. (1/6)^r is on the diagonal.

This leaves elements not on the diagonal. To find elements not on the diagonal, make use of the definition of conditional probability,

**It seems 12 only works for joint probability mass function, however the text references joint distribution functions. distribution functions include both probability density functions and probability mass functions.
 

frankfurt

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Messages
18
Gender
Female
HSC
2020
I think I understood the content.

The text seems a little bit off with the wording. Instead of saying joint distribution function for definition 11 they should say joint cumulative distribution function.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function

So what they really want if we going by there precise wording is actually the probability mass function of X and Y. Not the cumulative probability mass function. So I am not to sure how to use 12.**

So construct 6 by 6 matrix with X on the y-axis, Y on the x-axis. This matrix is an upper diagonal matrix by definition since X <= Y. (1/6)^r is on the diagonal.

This leaves elements not on the diagonal. To find elements not on the diagonal, make use of the definition of conditional probability,

**It seems 12 only works for joint probability mass function, however the text references joint distribution functions. distribution functions include both probability density functions and probability mass functions.
thanks for your help!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top