alphxreturns
Unknown Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2024
- Messages
- 694
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2025
im afraid you're alone on this oneI would rather redo paper 2 than do a 7 marker proof on binomial properties oml
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
im afraid you're alone on this oneI would rather redo paper 2 than do a 7 marker proof on binomial properties oml
they decide to test this they js wasting marks fr frVery decent chance this yr on p and cs. barely any was tested last yr. I'd argue as well that barely any probability questions were present either.
i think ruse is quite reasonable. nsb a little less, ppl say not to do them because theyre horribly written or smththey're still good practice, especially when hsc decides to pull some random questions out that other schools dont test
i took a look at girra and penrith, good recommendations. thanks
Im praying for no probability and pc stuff omdsIstg imma crash out if there's a chunky combinatorics question this year.
I can definitely see a trig sub polynomials question tho since haven't seen one in a few years I don't think
I’m guessing because ppl doing ext 1 have it as 1 unit while ppl doing ext 2 have it as 2 units, so 70 marks is the rough midpoint between 100 and 50guys this might be a silly question, but why are the hsc ext 1 exams out of 70, if we get a mark out of 50?
I think it's due to it being 2hrs long instead of 3hrs. So only 2/3 of 100 rounds to around 70 ishguys this might be a silly question, but why are the hsc ext 1 exams out of 70, if we get a mark out of 50?
2022 > 2023 > others > 2020What do people think was the hardest ext 1 hsc paper since new syllabus? Just want a reference cuz I'm expecting it to be hard
421?View attachment 49928 can someone try doing this?
yea u got it421?
binomial probability
p = 2/3
for P(x≥5) = 6C5 (2/3)^5(1/3) + 6C6(2/3)^6
then x 1200
I think the idea of alignment is just to rank you against the state. It makes sense since if u lose 2 marks, many people probably scored higher than you already. this is cause the tests are only out of 70does anybody know what raw is required to align to a high E4 (97, 98), and how big the margin between each mark is? if you have any examples, plz tell!
on the rawmarksdatabase, in 2024, a raw 84 became a 94, and a raw 87 is a 96 - it's insane to me that a 3 mark gap in raw was a 2 mark gap in aligned. do they just lump all of the higher ones together, in that case?
thanks guys!
does anybody know what raw is required to align to a high E4 (97, 98), and how big the margin between each mark is? if you have any examples, plz tell!
on the rawmarksdatabase, in 2024, a raw 84 became a 94, and a raw 87 is a 96 - it's insane to me that a 3 mark gap in raw was a 2 mark gap in aligned. do they just lump all of the higher ones together, in that case?
thanks guys!
I can't believe 5 people who couldn't even answer question 11 paid for their raw marksprobably around a 95?
Alignment works by a committee judging what raw mark gives 90, 80, 70 etc. Every other mark in between those cut-offs is linearly interpolated. So when a 87 aligns to a 96 for example, it doesn’t align exactly to a 96. It’s actually rounded to 96.does anybody know what raw is required to align to a high E4 (97, 98), and how big the margin between each mark is? if you have any examples, plz tell!
on the rawmarksdatabase, in 2024, a raw 84 became a 94, and a raw 87 is a 96 - it's insane to me that a 3 mark gap in raw was a 2 mark gap in aligned. do they just lump all of the higher ones together, in that case?
thanks guys!
the graph don't look linear to be thoAlignment works by a committee judging what raw mark gives 90, 80, 70 etc. Every other mark in between those cut-offs is linearly interpolated. So when a 87 aligns to a 96 for example, it doesn’t align exactly to a 96. It’s actually rounded to 96.