Moon landing was a hoax! (1 Viewer)

[Ancly]

agree or disagree

in light of discussings about nasa etc and comments about moon landing cost/benefits etc

 

[Iron]

omie kway should ban this fool

 

[Ancly]

i should hope not!

 

[Omie Jay]

haaahahahah!

and i believe the moon landing was real.

 

[Iron]

gelded u gurl

 

[Nintendo 64]

moon did wtc

 

[*TRUE*]

No hoax here.

 

[Kolefax]

It was true.

If you think not, prove it.

 

[Ancly]

the burden of proof lies with u arctualy guy

 

[Live Laugh Love]

I can't decide =\
Silly MythBusters.

 

[Ancly]

interesting

7% of the australian public believes that it is a hoax

/www.news.com.au journalism

 

[Serius]

disagree. Conspiracy nutjobs do nothing but piss me off. Go back to claiming jews did 9/11 thats far more entertaining.

If you are going to do this at least make it interesting and tell is why anyone should think it was a hoax, that way we can laugh at you.

 

[Planck]

Moon landing was real because the moon was where they put the beam weapon that did 9/11. It was why there was the red eclipse, it was the moon being destroyed and replaced by another moon to hide the evidence of 9/11

OPEN YOUR EYES AND JOIN THE DOTS

 

[spyro14]

disagree. Conspiracy nutjobs do nothing but piss me off. Go back to claiming jews did 9/11 thats far more entertaining.

If you are going to do this at least make it interesting and tell is why anyone should think it was a hoax, that way we can laugh at you.

You think that's bad? Some people think the Jews started the GFC just so more people would make the safer long term investments in Gold instead of property, just to increase the value of their "Jew Gold".

As for the moon landing...I think wait for the crazy conspiracy's to get posted first.

 

[Kolefax]

the burden of proof lies with u arctualy guy

Helium-3. Only way to get it is to go to a place where there is no atmosphere and get it from rocks there.

i have provided proof for. If anyone thinks otherwise, provide proof against.

 

[SnowFox]

For it to become valid you need a source, i learnt the hard way.

 

[Kolefax]

Race to the Moon for Nuclear Fuel

So it's scarce on Earth. But there is only one way to see if its on the moon. And i will give you a hint, we are a long way off spectroscopic sensors

 

[lolwth]

okay no explain how we cant get helium-3 from space rocks (asteroids etc) or from unmanned moon missions (no one is disputing these imo)

 

[Kolefax]

Wait, so your saying that instead of going to the moon, our friendly, neighbourhood satellite, we are going to fly like, over 3 times the distance to land on an asteroid, which is way more dangerous than a moon landing (space rocks as damaging debris and such). That just is not a logical decision.

However, the unmanned idea is viable. An unmanned craft surely could get to the moon. They've gone way further. e.g Voyager which flew past Jupiter and Saturn.

I will see if i can find anything on it.

EDIT: I have researched the subject and came up with this. These are all the programs within the time period of when the first moon landing was;

LUNA program:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_program
Did make it. Did return samples. However, these samples were not back on Earth until after the Apollo misions were.

RANGER program: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranger_program
This program was all about taking pictures of the moon. They never made back. actually, they never made it past hitting the ground.

SURVEYOR program: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_program
This program tested soft-landings for space craft. So not only did they never return to the Earth, they didn't have any of the equipment required for a unmanned probe to take samples.

LUNAR program: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Orbiter_program
This program never made to the surface of the moon, taking pictures from orbit.

 

[Kwayera]

Wait, so your saying that instead of going to the moon, our friendly, neighbourhood satellite, we are going to fly like, over 3 times the distance to land on an asteroid, which is way more dangerous than a moon landing (space rocks as damaging debris and such). That just is not a logical decision.

However, the unmanned idea is viable. An unmanned craft surely could get to the moon. They've gone way further. e.g Voyager which flew past Jupiter and Saturn.

I will see if i can find anything on it.

Much further than that. Both Voyagers and Pioneers 10 and 11 have left the solar system.