nina12 said:
w-w-w-w-what? that makes no sense 2 me, call me stupid if you like
Okay, what I mean is, you have two animals. One is called "Notorcytes caunrinus", the other is called "Talpa europaea". These two animals function ver differently, ie one is placental, one is marsupial, etc. However, they both adapted so that they could burrow, because in their respecive environments, that was a good way to survive. Hence they both adapted claws for digging and minimal eye sight.
Now, along comes man. Man lives in Europe. Man sees Talpa europaea, and decides to call it a "mole". Later, scientists decided to classify it in their new system, and class it as Talpa europaea, based on it physical characteristics (inc being placental), location, social structure, etc.
Man decides Europe is too small, and decides to go to Australia, where Notorcytes caurinus lives. Because these animals are shy, they are not seen full at first, but superficially, they resemble a mole, so they too are called a mole. Later, scientists classify them as not being a mole, but the name sticks.
The two animals are very different, they evolved along very different lines. But they superficially resemble each other, so man called them both "mole". That is the only way they are the same.
European moles did not migrate here and become australian moles. Hence the answer is D.