Please correct me if there is any typo.Another problem if u get bored of that one:
No using dilogarithms, only 4U stuff.
Do you have more hints?That's what I like about this question - due to the simplicity of the q, there seem to be so many ways of approaching it which don't go anywhere
I mean, you have to show why that sum is , but there are many ways of doing that in 4U, so it's basically done. That was also my method .Please correct me if there is any typo.
After a partial evaluation of the integral, you should get the original integral, which you can use for symmetry. See how that's possible. (note that this is quite cancerous to do, so you need to have some persistence)Do you have more hints?
It's difficult to judge the difficulty from appearance. sqrt(tan x) may look simple but it's more tedious to integrate than some horrible looking functions.why does Sharkys Integral look much easier compared to that
One more question
(It can be solved without knowing the result in #217.)
Continuing from aboveI have decided to give up @sharky564 question.
This is a new question that should be solvable in 4U.
That last section which results in a dilogarithm is entirely 4U-able, and you may see that if you try the Feynman in a slightly different way.
Let's try Feynman trick.
(Let t=cos x)
Note that I(0)=0 and let
This will unfortunately lead to dilogarithm but at least this is a way out. I will be extremely impressed if someone can provide a solution using 4U methods.