[4m th4 8ur82]
Member
so where does the cutting wages thing come in again??
sorry, im slow...
sorry, im slow...
The natural rate of unemployment, also known as the non-accelerating-inflation rate of unemplyotment is the lowest rate to which unemployment can fall before shortages of labour lead to excessive pay raises and, hence, worsening inflation. (higher wages -> more money to spend -> higher agg demand -> higher prices = inflation)Originally posted by mushroom_head
so what has the natural rate of unemployment got to do with inflation?? hehe..i still don't get it!
that's what i wanna know too. but in the article, Gittens said that they are unsure whether the normal unempl. rate is under the NAIRU so i think it's possible. i "think"!Originally posted by kochou
[B
so taht would mean NAIRU/natural rate of unemployments CANT be lower than normal unemployment rate which is under 6% ..? [/B]
lol i reckon eh! can't they just stick with the same name to make life easier for people like me?!Originally posted by kochou
they try so hard to confuse us, all these names for the same thing grrrr
Was just about to explain exactly the same thing. Nicely doneiwantnotes&stuf said:yeah thats a good article
there are a few good explanations already, but;
nairu is the same as the 'natural rate'. it is argued that 0% of unemployment is impossible,[ and it is in all of todays economies for a huge number of reasons]. the natural rate is a medium term concept- which can't be accurately measured, but is somewhere between 5-6% at the moment. [ last year it was probably 6-7%..?]
Even if we get unemployment down to 3% - at the cost of say 10% inflation, in a matter of months/weeks- the unemployment rate will rise back up to 5-6% .
hope that helps anyone
The name NAIRU will help you remember what the natural rate of inflation means.Wild Dan Hibiki said:ok so the natural rate of unemployment occurs when all economic resources are employed?