wrong, ross gittins has stated that the fair pay comission would not let wages fall in real terms because the dole is indexed to inlflation. therefore the government would be creating disincentives to work, which it would never do.gorgo31 said:Any aspiring Young Liberals might like to balance their discussion of the reforms with the concerns of the Fair Pay Commission refusing to index any minimum wage increase to inflation, thereby leading to the possibility of real minimum wage decline. As well as this, the "No disadvantage" test of the Employment Advocate will be scrapped, and Unfair Dismissal legislation for those at businesses employing less than 100 employees will also be abolished.
Currently, no one who enters into an Australian Workplace Agreement (AWA) is allowed to be worse off under that Agreement than they would be under their relevant award or existing legislation. This will no longer be promised.nosadness said:what is the no disadvantage test?
The dole being indexed to inflation doesn't prove anything except that those receiving it won't, in real terms, be worse off. It may be a disincentive to workers considering joining the workforce, but it is speculation as to whether or not the Government will keep the minimum wage pinned tightly to inflation. It will make these decisions at its discretion.pete_mate said:wrong, ross gittins has stated that the fair pay comission would not let wages fall in real terms because the dole is indexed to inlflation. therefore the government would be creating disincentives to work, which it would never do.
the fair pay comissionm will therefore only let wages fall in relative terms.
I don't think so- they asked one in 2003:Insanity said:So do you think there will be an essay question on labour market policies this year then?